Commonly Used Terms and Definitions

Cluster Munitions Remnant Survey

The application of all reasonable effort, through non-technical survey and technical survey procedures, to identify and define a confirmed hazardous area impacted by unexploded cluster munition remnants.

Explosive Hazard

Any object that could explode causing harm, including but not limited to explosive remnants of war, improvised explosive devices, landmines, ammunition, or unexploded ordnance.

Explosive Ordnance Disposal

The detection, identification, evaluation, render safe, recovery and disposal of explosive ordnance.

Explosive Ordnance Disposal Call-out

Investigation and disposal activity of suspected explosive ordnance(s).

Explosive Ordnance Risk Education

Activities which seek to reduce the risk of injury from mines or explosive remnants of war by raising awareness through public information dissemination, education, and training.

Explosive Remnant of War

Abandoned explosive ordnance and unexploded ordnance.

Implementing Partner

Organizations selected to implement specific grant agreements according to an agreed upon work plan.

Improvised Explosive Device

A device placed or fabricated in an improvised manner incorporating explosive material, destructive, lethal, noxious, incendiary, pyrotechnic materials or chemicals designed to destroy, disfigure, distract, or harass. They may incorporate military stores, but are normally devised from non-military components.

Landmine

An anti-personnel or anti-tank mine designed to be exploded by the presence, proximity or contact of a person and that will incapacitate, injure, or kill one or more persons or a mine designed to detonate by the presence, proximity or contact of a vehicle.

Land Cleared

A defined area cleared through the removal and/or destruction of all specified explosive ordnance hazards to a specified depth.

Man-Portable Air Defense System (MANPADS) and Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGM)

MANPADS are shoulder-fired surface-to-air missile consisting of a guided missile enclosed in a launch tube, a reusable trigger mechanism (“gripstock”), and a single-use battery or battery-cooling unit. ATGMs are guided missiles primarily designed to destroy armored military vehicles.

Physical Security and Stockpile Management

Standards for arms and ammunition maintenance including monitoring of stockpiles, training of qualified experts, facility upgrades and maintenance, and long-term planning for infrastructure, resources, and procurement associated with arms and ammunition.

Stockpile Management Training

The training of personnel in physical security and stockpile management

Small Arms Ammunition

Cartridges ranging in size from .22 caliber through 30 millimeter that are intended for various types of handheld or mounted weapons including rifles, pistols, revolvers, machine guns, and shotguns.

Small Arms and Light Weapons

Man-portable weapons systems designed either for individual use, or by two or three persons serving as a crew. For example: handguns, grenades launchers, machine guns, etc.

Survivor Assistance

Aid, relief, and support provided to explosive ordnance survivors to reduce the immediate and long-term medical and psychological implications of their trauma.

Battle Area Clearance

The systematic and controlled clearance of hazardous areas where the hazards are known not to include mines.

Handheld Standoff Mine Detection System

A dual sensor, handheld mine detector that combines an electromagnetic induction sensor, ground penetrating radar, and sophisticated algorithms to detect landmines while rejecting most clutter, also known as false positives.

Humanitarian Mine Action

Clearance, risk education, survivor assistance, advocacy, and stockpile destruction of mines and explosive remnants of war by humanitarian organizations to restore peace and security at the community level.

International Ammunition Technical Guidelines

An internationally recognized frame of reference developed by the United Nations to achieve and demonstrate effective levels of safety and security of ammunition stockpiles.

International Mine Action Standards

The framework by which the Anti-personnel Mine Ban Convention and Convention on Cluster Munitions can be practically implemented.

Unexploded Ordnance

Explosive ordnance that has been primed, fuzed, armed, or otherwise prepared for use or used. It may have been fired, dropped, launched, or projected, yet it remains unexploded either through malfunction or design or for any other reason. This does not include landmines or stockpiled ammunition and explosives.

Weapons and Ammunition Destruction

The process of final conversion of weapons, ammunition and explosives into an inert state that can no longer function as designed.

Battle Area Clearance

The systematic and controlled clearance of hazardous areas where the hazards are known not to include mines.

 

Funding Acronyms and Definitions

DOS NADR-CWD

Department of State - Nonproliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining and Related Programs

DOS Other

Department of State - Other funding

CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

DoD

Department of Defense

USAID

U.S. Agency for International Development

Back to General Information Menu

A Message from Assistant Secretary Jessica Lewis

3-jessica-lewis.jpg

It is incredibly rewarding for me to lead efforts to help reestablish safety, stability, security, and prosperity for many children, women, and men around the world through the U.S. Conventional Weapons Destruction Program. We are living in challenging and uncertain times as our adversaries and strategic competitors seek to upend global order and the values that the American people stand for. Despite the global conflicts and challenges we continue to face, the United States, through our conventional weapons destruction program, remains committed to supporting communities striving to recover from conflict to achieve security and prosperity.

In this year’s edition of To Walk the Earth in Safety, we highlight the many ways that U.S. conventional weapons destruction assistance promotes post-conflict recovery. For example, our humanitarian demining funding enhances food security by helping to revitalize agricultural fields in countries like Sri Lanka and Vietnam. This funding is especially critical in Sri Lanka where more than 6 million people—nearly 30 percent of the population—are currently food-insecure. In Vietnam, our commitment to promoting agricultural security is a key component to successful post-conflict recovery, even decades after war ended.

In Ukraine, Russia’s unlawful war and full-scale invasion has littered massive swaths of the country with landmines, unexploded ordnance, and improvised explosive devices. These explosive hazards exacerbate food insecurity by blocking access to farmland and impede restoration of damaged agricultural storage and processing facilities. Clearing landmines from Ukraine’s agricultural land is directly linked to global food security and is a prerequisite for Ukraine’s recovery. The United States has invested over $182 million since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to help the Government of Ukraine address this urgent humanitarian challenge. Our programs in Ukraine and around the world safely remove landmines and explosive remnants of war, helping displaced persons and refugees return home safely and facilitating economic security and prosperity.

Additionally, we have also seen how clearance of landmines and explosive remnants of war help revitalize historical and cultural areas, enabling families to return to post-conflict communities. For example, in Mosul, Iraq, the historic Old City was riddled with notoriously deadly improvised explosive devices from ISIS militants. With the help of U.S. conventional weapons destruction funding and other international donor assistance, critical parts of the Old City have been cleared, allowing internally displaced persons to return to their homes, and helping to promote stability and security for war-torn communities.

As a former teacher, I am particularly proud of our efforts to fund risk education to prevent and safeguard children from accidents as well as our funding for vocational training for mine survivors. For example, in Laos, we have funded explosive ordnance risk education via social media, radio, and print, and as part of secondary school curriculums. Additionally, in Zimbabwe, our funding has helped distribute risk education materials to schools in rural communities, simultaneously encouraging safe behavior around explosive hazards and improving literacy for more than 7,000 children. These programs not only save lives but improve education and livelihoods in post-conflict communities.

Beyond threats posed by landmines and unexploded ordnance, communities often face dangers from poorly secured government stockpiles of small arms, light weapons, and ammunition. Through our conventional weapons destruction assistance, we help destroy obsolete weapons stockpiles and safeguard weapons to prevent them from being acquired by criminal organizations, terrorists, and violent extremist groups. By limiting bad actors’ means to create further chaos and instability, we help save lives and provide safety and security to civilians.

A person in blue protective clothing walks on a path by a sign that says Danger Mines

A Ukrainian deminer in training. Courtesy of MAG (Mines Advisory Group).

Another critical element of U.S. conventional weapons destruction assistance involves supporting the responsible management of advanced conventional weapons, including man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS) and anti-tank guided missiles. While these have legitimate military uses, when in the hands of violent non-state actors, they pose a risk to human safety, economic stability, and global security, especially in post-conflict recovery environments. In coordination with allies and international organizations, our assistance helps partner countries safely secure, manage, and destroy obsolete weapons and train their staff on how to recognize and interdict these weapons and their components.

Despite the global conflicts and challenges we continue to face, the U.S. Conventional Weapons Destruction Program continues to be a beacon of hope for many communities striving to recover from conflict. Our assistance detailed in this year’s To Walk the Earth in Safety report serves as a clear, tangible, and unmistakable symbol of the United States’ commitment to build a more safe, secure, and prosperous world and illustrates our steadfast effort to enable all people to walk the earth in safety.

 

Back to General Information Menu

The United States’ Commitment to Conventional Weapons Destruction

Some foreign governments’ stockpiles of aging, excess, poorly secured, and improperly maintained small arms, light weapons, and ammunition threaten peace and prosperity globally, and can even impact the United States’ own national security. When obtained by criminals and terrorists, all of these munitions, including advanced types such as man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS), fuel violence and instability. In the wrong hands, MANPADS even menace global aviation. Stockpiles of decrepit ammunition may explode suddenly, devastating nearby communities, crippling infrastructure, and polluting water and farmland. Landmines and unexploded ammunition kill and maim people decades after conflicts end. Since the 1990s, the United States has recognized and confronted all of these deadly legacies regardless of which country or non-state actors have generated these “hidden killers.” The U.S. goals are clear: protect innocent people, and help them regain safe access to their homes, fields, medical care, schools, business enterprises, and essential infrastructure such as water treatment plants. U.S. leadership in conventional weapons destruction supports peacebuilding, food security, and even climate resilience, creating stronger partners to help promote U.S. foreign policy objectives throughout the world.

THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S COLLABORATIVE APPROACH: LEVERAGING AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS

The United States is the world’s top supporter of conventional weapons destruction, providing more than $5.09 billion in assistance to over 125 countries and areas since 1993. The Department of State, Department of Defense, and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) work with foreign governments, private companies, international organizations, and nongovernmental organizations to reduce excess small arms and light weapons, and ammunition stockpiles (including MANPADS), implement physical security and stockpile management, and conduct humanitarian mine action.

In fiscal year 2023, the Department of State invested more than $348 million* in conventional weapons destruction, and continued to lead the U.S. Interagency MANPADS Task Force, which coordinates MANPADS counter-diversion efforts by the Departments of State, Defense, Homeland Security, and other stakeholders. Through these coordinated efforts, the U.S. government helps partner nations eliminate excess MANPADS and better secure the systems they keep. In addition, the Department of Defense Humanitarian Demining Training Center trains deminers, ammunition handlers, and stockpile managers from partner countries. Additionally, the Department of Defense Humanitarian Demining Research and Development Program improves conventional weapons destruction technologies, increasing the efficiency and safety of humanitarian demining worldwide. USAID’s Leahy War Victims Fund assists survivors of encounters with landmines and explosive remnants of war.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE SUPPORT FOR CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS DESTRUCTION

The Department of State has managed more than 76 percent (more than $3.86 billion) of the United States’ contribution to conventional weapons destruction since 1993, with three objectives:

  • Enhance U.S. and international security by destroying and safeguarding small arms and light weapons, including MANPADS, at risk of proliferation to criminals, terrorists, and other violent non-state actors.
  • Improve stability and prosperity by clearing landmines and explosive remnants of war and returning land to productive use.
  • Build trust and deepen relationships with key partners to speed achievement of broader U.S. foreign policy objectives.
Two people stand in a field wearing beige brim hats and look at a clipboard

Personnel in Laos conduct survey work. Courtesy of Norwegian People’s Aid.

Robust project performance standards, rigorous monitoring and evaluation, and a comprehensive planning process guide the Department of State’s Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement’s decisions and hold its implementing partners accountable for delivering results to the American people.

The measurable, tangible results that flow from the U.S. government’s commitment to conventional weapons destruction reinforce U.S. foreign policies, and these programs help protect the lives and livelihoods of civilians worldwide so they may safely remain and thrive in their own countries.

*Initial planned allocations

1993–2022 Global Overview of the U.S. Conventional Weapons Destruction Program

6-7-map.jpg            

Map legend

Countries with U.S. funded conventional weapons destruction activity in FY 2023:
  • Afghanistan
  • Angola
  • Armenia
  • Azerbaijan
  • Cabo Verde
  • Caribbean Region
  • Benin
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Burkina Faso
  • Burma
  • Cambodia
  • Chad
  • Colombia
  • Congo, DR
  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Croatia
  • Cyprus
  • Ecuador
  • Estonia
  • Fiji
  • Georgia
  • Iraq
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kenya
  • Kyrgyz Republic
  • Laos
  • Lebanon
  • Libya
  • Malawi
  • Marshall Islands
  • Mauritania
  • Moldova
  • Morocco
  • Nepal
  • Niger
  • Pakistan
  • Palau
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Peru
  • Senegal
  • Serbia
  • Sierra Leone
  • Slovakia
  • Solomon Islands
  • Somalia
  • Sudan
  • South Sudan
  • Solomon Islands
  • Sri Lanka
  • Tanzania
  • Tajikistan
  • Thailand
  • Timor-Leste
  • Togo
  • Uganda
  • Ukraine
  • Vietnam
  • West Bank area
  • Yemen
  • Zimbabwe
Countries that received U.S. support in the past:
  • Argentina
  • Bahrain
  • Belize
  • Bolivia
  • Bulgaria
  • Central African Republic
  • Chile
  • Congo, Republic of
  • Czechia
  • Dominican Republic
  • Egypt
  • Equitorial Guinea
  • Eritrea
  • Ethiopia
  • The Gambia
  • Guinea
  • Haiti
  • Hungary
  • India
  • Jamaica
  • Kiribati
  • Lesotho
  • Liberia
  • Lithuania
  • Mali
  • Mexico
  • Micronesia
  • Nigeria
  • Oman
  • Paraguay
  • Philippines
  • Romania
  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Slovakia
  • Slovenia
  • Surname
  • Syria
  • Tuvalu
  • Uruguay
  • Uzbekistan
Countries that are mine-impact free and received U.S. conventional weapons destruction support in FY 2023:
  • Albania
  • El Salvador
  • Guatemala
  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Honduras
  • Jordan
  • Kosovo
  • Montenegro
  • North Macedonia
  • Rwanda
Countries that are mine-impact free and received U.S. conventional weapons destruction support in the past:
  • Burundi
  • Costa Rica
  • Djibouti
  • Eswatini
  • Mozambique
  • Namibia
  • Nicaragua
  • Tunisia
Top 10 countries receiving conventional weapons destruction funding since 1993 (dollars in thousands).

Country

Funding received since 1993 (dollars in thousands)

Iraq

$715,158

Afghanistan

$579,057

Laos

$391,392

Ukraine

$263,565

Vietnam

$234,750

Colombia

$229,209

Cambodia

$208,369

Angola

$164,338

Bosnia and Herzegovina

$139,915

Lebanon

$102,891

Allocation of total U.S. conventional weapons destruction funding by region FY 1993-FY 2023.

Region

Total by region since FY1993 (dollars in thousands)

Africa

$594,052

East Asia and Pacific

$912,325

Europe

$751,317

Middle East and North Africa

$1,092,646

South and Central Asia

$757,968

Western Hemisphere

$333,295

Global/Multi-country

$607,986

Total

$5,093,010

 

Back to General Information Menu

International Mine Action Standards

Screenshot of IMAS websiteThe International Mine Action Standards (IMAS) is the framework that provides clear guidance and a standardized approach for conducting mine action activities to maximize safety, efficiency, and quality management. The IMAS framework was launched by the United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS) in 2001, after a multi-year process that built on initial standards proposed by the humanitarian demining community in 1996.

The IMAS is not a legal instrument; it is a set of technical guidelines intended to inform and shape the development of an individual country’s national mine action standards and operating procedures. Nonetheless, it is widely accepted and used by nongovernmental organizations, governments, and donor countries. The Department of State’s Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement requires that all the work its implementing partners undertaken with U.S. funds meet the IMAS. The framework also clarifies the practical implementation of certain provisions of key disarmament conventions such as the Anti-personnel Mine Ban Convention and Convention on Cluster Munitions for States Parties.

UNMAS is responsible for the development and maintenance of the IMAS. Administration is provided by the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining, which maintains the IMAS website, and organizes both the IMAS Steering Group and the IMAS Review Board. The Steering Group is made up of UN-based entities, the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining, donor country representatives, and national mine action authority representatives to provide executive guidance and oversight of the Review Board. The Review Board is chaired by UNMAS and includes approximately 30 mine action organizations, including nongovernmental organizations, national mine action authorities, donor countries, and subject-matter experts. The Review Board meets on a regular basis to assess and revise current standards and consider new standards to ensure that the IMAS address the evolving needs of the mine action community.

The IMAS contain detailed technical information and operational guidance for implementing organizations and national authorities to perform tasks consistently. The standards include all facets of mine action, including establishing a national mine action program, survey and clearance, risk education, survivor assistance, and the myriad details that make up humanitarian mine action. The IMAS has expanded as the field has evolved, including standards on improvised explosive device disposal, environmental risk management, guidance for managing human remains, and others.

The IMAS is comprised of three types of documents: the Mine Action Standards, Technical Notes for Mine Action, and Test and Evaluation Protocols. The IMAS aims to promote a common and consistent approach to the conduct of mine action operations. It provides guidance, establish principles, and in some cases, define international specifications. Technical Notes are advisory documents that accompany or supplement IMAS, providing advice and information relevant to a specific IMAS or technical subject. In short, the IMAS outline what should be done and the Technical Notes describe how to do it. Test and Evaluation Protocols are technical requirements on topics such as competencies for explosive ordnance disposal and animal detection systems. To date the IMAS includes 47 Standards, 23 Technical Notes, and seven Test and Evaluation Protocols.

The IMAS is available online, and many are translated into various languages including Arabic, French, Korean, Persian, Russian, and Ukrainian.

https://www.mineactionstandards.org

Implementing Partners
Nongovernmental Organizations Headquartered in the United States

Catholic Relief Services (CRS), established in 1943, is the official overseas relief and development agency of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. Catholic Relief Services works to reduce the risk of injury or death from unexploded ordnance in Vietnam through explosive ordnance risk education programs. http://crs.org

The Golden West Humanitarian Foundation (GWHF) is a U.S.-based nonprofit organization that provides explosive ordnance disposal and physical security and stockpile management consulting, International Mine Action Standards and International Ammunition Technical Guidelines compliant training, and technology to make humanitarian mine action safer, faster, and more cost effective. http://goldenwesthf.org

The Marshall Legacy Institute (MLI) is a Virginia-based nonprofit organization founded to help restore hope, alleviate suffering, and nurture stability in war-torn countries. Marshall Legacy Institute has established indigenous programs in 15 mine-affected countries. http://marshall-legacy.org

Momentum Wheels for Humanity is a California nonprofit founded in 2007 that helps people with mobility impairments maximize their independence and quality of life by building and strengthening rehabilitation services, including assistive technologies. https://momentum4humanity.org

PeaceTrees Vietnam is a Seattle-based nongovernmental organization founded in 1995 as a grassroots effort to bring peace, friendship, and renewal to the people of Quang Tri Province, Vietnam through explosive hazard clearance, explosive ordnance risk education, survivor assistance, scholarships to landmine survivors and their families, and community restoration projects. http://peacetreesvietnam.org

The Polus Center for Social and Economic Development, established in 1979, is a Massachusetts-based nonprofit, nongovernmental organization that partners with public and private foundations to address the impact of mines and unexploded ordnance around the world. http://poluscenter.org

World Education, Inc., (WEI) a Massachusetts-based nonprofit organization, was founded in 1951 to meet the needs of the educationally disadvantaged and supports survivor assistance, explosive ordnance risk education, and disability inclusion in Laos. http://worlded.org


International and Foreign Nongovernmental Organizations

Accessibility Organization for Afghan Disabled (AOAD) is a nonprofit and nonpolitical nongovernmental organization founded in 2007 in Kabul as a peer-support, advocate organization for persons with disabilities and their immediate family. https://aoad-af.page.tl/Home.htm

Afghan Technical Consultants, was established in 1989 to reduce civilian casualties and enable land release through detection, clearance, and explosive ordnance risk education.

http://atc-wlfhdngo.org.af

APOPO, established in 1995, is a registered Belgian nongovernmental organization and U.S. nonprofit that trains sub-Saharan African pouched rats and mine detection dogs to help detect landmines. https://www.apopo.org/en

Arcangeles Foundation is a nonprofit working to improve the living conditions of vulnerable populations in Colombia to achieve social inclusion and to ensure an inclusive and sustainable world for future generations. https://arcangeles.org

The Colombian Campaign Against Landmines (CCCM) monitors fulfillment of the Ottawa Convention on behalf of the Colombian Government, compiles reports each year for the Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor, and supports survivor assistance and explosive ordnance risk education. https://colombiasinminas.org

Conflict Armament Research (CAR), established in 2011, works toward understanding the landscape of illicit weapon flows and mitigating the supply of conventional arms to unauthorized users, including insurgent and terrorist forces. https://www.conflictarm.com

DanChurchAid (DCA), an independent ecumenical humanitarian organization based in Copenhagen, Denmark, provides humanitarian assistance and mine action programs combining explosive ordnance risk education, mine clearance, and community-development. http://dca.dk

The Danish Refugee Council’s (DRC) Humanitarian Disarmament and Peacebuilding unit is a nonprofit and nongovernmental organization working to protect and provide long-lasting solutions to communities affected by war and armed conflict. https://www.drc.ngo

Delvon Assistance for Social Harmony (DASH) is a Sri Lankan humanitarian demining organization founded in 2010 to increase the safety and security of people living in mine-affected areas by clearing explosive hazards. https://www.facebook.com/p/Delvon-Assistance-For-Social-Harmony-DASH-100064502060186

The Demining Agency for Afghanistan (DAFA) was formed in 1990 to clear all hazardous and mine-contaminated areas in Afghanistan prioritizing clearance for road reconstruction, local governmen,t-sponsored construction plans, and disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration. sattar_dafa@yahoo.ca or dafafinance@yahoo.com

Fondation suisse de déminage (FSD) is a Swiss humanitarian organization founded in 1997 that locates and destroys explosive hazards, strengthens local capacities, conducts awareness-raising campaigns, and provides support to victims of accidental explosions. FSD has conducted operations in over 30 countries, including Ukraine, Iraq, and Afghanistan. https://fsd.ch/en/

Free Fields Foundation is a neutral, nonprofit, humanitarian mine action organization founded in 2012 and based in Tripoli, Libya, to conduct explosive ordnance risk education, non-technical survey, explosive ordnance disposal, and battle area clearance. https://freefields.org

The HALO Trust’s (HALO) mission is to protect lives and restore livelihoods for those affected by conflict by clearing explosive hazards to create safe and secure environments in vulnerable communities. https://www.halotrust.org

Humanity & Inclusion (HI) works with persons with disabilities and other vulnerable populations in situations resulting from conflict by clearing explosive hazards from civilian areas, providing explosive ordnance risk education programs, and rendering assistance to the injured. https://www.hi-us.org

Information Management and Mine Action Programs (iMMAP) is an international nonprofit nongovernmental organization that provides targeted data collection, analysis, and information management support to partners responding to complex humanitarian and development challenges. http://immap.org

The International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) is a coalition of nongovernmental organizations whose stated objective is a world free of anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions, where mine and cluster munitions survivors see their rights respected and can lead fulfilling lives. http://www.icbl.org/en-gb/home.aspx

ITF Enhancing Human Security is a humanitarian nonprofit organization established by the Republic of Slovenia in 1998 to focus on humanitarian demining, conventional weapons destruction, and other forms of post-conflict assistance. http://itf.si

MAG (Mines Advisory Group) is a humanitarian organization working in countries affected by conflict and insecurity to clear explosive hazards, implement conventional weapons stockpile management and destruction programs, provide explosive ordnance risk education, and offer capacity-building support. http://maginternational.org

The Mine Clearance Planning Agency (MCPA) is an Afghan nongovernmental organization founded in 1990 specializing in manual, mechanical, and mine detection dog clearance, explosive ordnance disposal, explosive ordnance risk education, training, and management information systems for mine action. hajiattqullah@gmail.com

The Mine Detection Center (MDC), established in 1989, clears contaminated land and safely destroy explosive hazards in Afghanistan. https://mdcafghan.org

The Mine Detection Dog Center (MDDC) in Bosnia and Herzegovina trains handlers, trainers, and dogs to detect landmines, explosives, narcotics, and conduct search and rescue operations. It also provides explosive ordnance risk education and mine survivor assistance. http://www.mddc.ba/

Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA) a Norwegian nongovernmental organization founded in 1939, has implemented mine action programs in more than 40 countries and territories for over 20 years. http://npaid.org

The Organization for Mine Clearance and Afghan Rehabilitation was established in 1990 to teach Afghan refugees and internally displaced Afghans about the dangers of explosive hazards and has since expanded to include mine clearance, battle area clearance, explosive ordnance disposal, and working with mine detection dogs. https://omar.org.af/

Results 4 Development is a global nonprofit founded in 2008 that supports local change agents—government officials, civil society leaders, and social innovators—to drive reforms and engage in continuous improvement. https://r4d.org

Spirit of Soccer (SOS), founded in 1996, is a UK- and U.S.-registered nonprofit that uses soccer/football skills clinics and tournaments to educate children about the dangers posed by explosive hazards in conflict and post-conflict regions. http://spiritofsoccer.org


Government and International Organizations

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) physical rehabilitation capacity was established in 1983 to improve in low- and middle-income countries by maintaining and increasing access to quality and sustainable services. https://www.icrc.org/en

NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA) is NATO’s integrated logistics and services provider agency implementing the NATO Partnership for Peace Trust Fund in Ukraine, and has worked on physical security and stockpile management and conventional weapons destruction programs in numerous countries. https://www.nspa.nato.int

The Organization of American States (OAS) was established in 1948 to encourage sustainable peace, justice, solidarity, collaboration, integrity, and independence among the nations of the Americas. The OAS supports a regional approach to demining programs in the Western Hemisphere and executes conventional weapons destruction programs too. https://www.oas.org/en/topics/demining.asp

The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) is a regional security organization with 57 participating states in Europe, Central Asia, and North America, which provides a forum for political dialogue and decision-making in the fields of early warning, conflict prevention, crisis management, and post-conflict rehabilitation. http://osce.org

The Regional Centre on Small Arms in the Great Lakes Region, Horn of Africa, and Bordering States (RECSA) was established in June 2005 to build the capacity of its 15 African member countries and coordinate and monitor implementation of the Nairobi Protocol signed in April 2004 to mitigate small arms and light weapons proliferation in the Great Lakes region, Horn of Africa, and bordering states. http://recsasec.org

The Tajikistan National Mine Action Center (TNMAC), established in January 2014, is a state institution under the Government of the Republic of Tajikistan that coordinates all mine action-related projects in that country. muhabbat.ibrohimzoda@tnmac.gov.tj

The United Nations Development Program/Southeastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (UNDP/SEESAC) works to strengthen the capacities of national and regional stakeholders to control and reduce the proliferation and misuse of small arms and light weapons, advance gender equality, and facilitate regional cooperation. https://www.seesac.org

The United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS), established in 1997 by the UN General Assembly under the Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Office of Rule of Law and Security Institutions manages the Inter-Agency Coordination Group on Mine Action, which brings together working-level representatives of 12 UN organizations involved in mine action to set priorities among UN participants. UNMAS establishes and manages mine action coordination centers in countries and territories as part of peacekeeping operations. http://www.mineaction.org/unmas

United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) was established in 1973 to advance sustainable infrastructure, procurement, project management, human resources, and financial management services practices in development, humanitarian, and peacebuilding contexts in challenging environments. https://www.unops.org

The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized United Nations agency responsible for international public health. WHO’s mandate includes advocating for universal healthcare, monitoring public health risks, coordinating responses to health emergencies, and promoting human health and well-being. https://www.who.int


Academic Institutions

The Center for International Stabilization and Recovery (CISR), at James Madison University, established in 1996, supports information exchange within the conventional weapons destruction community through its website and the publication of the U.S. Department of State’s annual report, To Walk the Earth in Safety, and CISR’s The Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction, in addition to conducting international mine action and capacity building projects.  https://www.jmu.edu/cisr 

The Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) formed in 1998 supports the improvement of mine action by working with national authorities, mine action organizations, and other partners to do their jobs better by furthering knowledge, promoting norms and standards, and developing capacity. http://gichd.org

Johns Hopkins University-Bloomberg School of Public Health, based in Baltimore, Maryland and founded in 1916, works with communities and populations to identify the causes of disease and disability, and implement large-scale solutions. https://www.jhsph.edu

Small Arms Survey (SAS), based at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva, Switzerland, serves as the principal international source of public information on all aspects of small arms and armed violence. http://smallarmssurvey.org


Contractor

Tetra Tech is a leading provider of consulting and engineering services for projects worldwide. With 20,000 associates working together, Tetra Tech delivers clear solutions to complex problems in water, environment, infrastructure, resource management, energy, international development, and munitions response. https://www.tetratech.com/en/markets/international-development/services/stabilization/munitions-response

Back to General Information Menu

United States Conventional Weapons Destruction Funding

From 1993 through 2022, the United States contributed more than $4.6 billion for conventional weapons destruction programs in more than 120 countries or areas. The following charts provide a consolidated view of the United States’ funding for conventional weapons destruction globally. Budget figures for fiscal year 2021 (October 1, 2020–September 30, 2021) and prior years reflect actual allocations, while budget figures for fiscal year 2022 (October 1, 2021–September 30, 2022) reflect, with a few exceptions, initial planned allocations. The 23rd edition of To Walk the Earth in Safety will include updated figures for fiscal year 2022 that reflect the final allocations.

Funding Acronyms and Definitions

Abbreviation

Definition

A: U.S. supported activity in FY23

B: Received U.S. support in the past

C: Mine-impact* free & U.S. supported activity in FY23

D: Mine-impact* free with past U.S. support

*For purposes of this document, countries denoted as mine impact free are countries that are free from the dangers of landmines to the general population but not necessarily free from all land mines.

 

DOS NADR-CWD

Department Of State - Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining and Related Programs

DOS Other

Department Of State - Other Funding

CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

DoD

Department of Defense

USAID

U.S. Agency for International Development

 

 1993-2020  2021 2022 2023 Grand Total
*Global Multi-Country
1DOS NADR - CWD           225,397 8,450 25,253 39,703 298,803
2DOS Other               1,450 1,450
3CDC             18,653 18,653
4DoD           211,211 1,117 200 9,313 221,841
5USAID           136,246 9,123 10,717 9,883 165,969
*Global Multi-Country Total           592,957 18,690 36,170 58,899 706,716
Afghanistan                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD           455,391 20,000 15,000 5,000 495,391
2DOS Other             20,000 20,000
3CDC               1,800 1,800
4DoD               9,636 330 193 260 10,419
5USAID             51,447 51,447
Afghanistan Total           538,274 20,330 15,193 5,260 579,057
Albania                      
1DOS NADR - CWD             44,247 750 500 500 45,997
4DoD               4,443 663 3,380 2,657 11,143
5USAID               1,389 1,389
Albania Total             50,079 1,413 3,880 3,157 58,529
Angola                     
1DOS NADR - CWD           124,604 4,000 8,500 5,500 142,604
2DOS Other               3,170 3,170
3CDC                  150 150
4DoD               9,456 172 145 290 10,063
5USAID               8,351 8,351
Angola Total           145,731 4,172 8,645 5,790 164,338
Argentina                    
4DoD                  579 579
Argentina Total                  579 579
Armenia                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               4,292 4,292
2DOS Other               3,000 3,000
4DoD               3,768 3,768
5USAID               3,145 3,145
Armenia Total             14,205 14,205
Azerbaijan                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             22,642 500 2,000 2,000 27,142
2DOS Other               1,100 1,100
4DoD               7,229 2,225 280 9,734
Azerbaijan Total             30,971 500 4,225 2,280 37,976
Bahrain                     -  
4DoD                    10 10
Bahrain Total                    10 10
Belize                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  300 300
Belize Total                  300 300
Benin                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  562 500 500 500 2,062
4DoD                    14 14
Benin Total                  576 500 500 500 2,076
Bosnia & Herzegovina                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             94,455 4,400 5,850 5,250 109,955
2DOS Other               1,000 1,000
3CDC               3,210 3,210
4DoD               5,143 22 15 70 5,250
5USAID             20,500 20,500
Bosnia & Herzegovina Total           124,308 4,422 5,865 5,320 139,915
Bulgaria                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             12,479 300 12,779
4DoD                    51 51
Bulgaria Total             12,530 300 12,830
Burkina Faso                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               3,941 1,500 1,500 500 7,441
Burkina Faso Total               3,941 1,500 1,500 500 7,441
Burma (Myanmar)                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               2,835 2,835
2DOS Other                  850 850
5USAID               5,350 500 5,850
Burma (Myanmar) Total               9,035 500 9,535
Burundi                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               1,935 1,935
4DoD               1,436 1,436
Burundi Total               3,371 3,371
Cabo Verde                     -  
4DoD                     -   39 39
Cabo Verde Total                     -   39 39
Cambodia                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD           122,747 9,000 12,000 12,000 155,747
2DOS Other               4,943 4,943
3CDC                  100 100
4DoD             29,149 1,361 515 1,470 32,495
5USAID             15,084 15,084
Cambodia Total           172,023 10,361 12,515 13,470 208,369
Caribbean Region                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  750 750
2DOS Other               1,100 1,100
Caribbean Region Total               1,850 1,850
Central African Republic                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               1,009 1,009
Central African Republic Total               1,009 1,009
Chad                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             13,556 1,000 1,000 1,000 16,556
4DoD               5,190 5,190
Chad Total             18,746 1,000 1,000 1,000 21,746
Chile                     -  
4DoD               3,450 3,450
Chile Total               3,450 3,450
Colombia                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD           122,599 21,000 21,000 21,000 185,599
3CDC                  450 450
4DoD             12,559 37 1,087 110 13,793
5USAID             24,367 500 2,500 2,000 29,367
Colombia Total           159,975 21,537 24,587 23,110 229,209
Congo, DRC                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             27,334 3,000 2,000 2,000 34,334
4DoD               1,083 1,083
5USAID               7,597 7,597
Congo, DRC Total             36,014 3,000 2,000 2,000 43,014
Congo, Republic of the                      -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               1,320 1,320
4DoD               1,519 1,519
Congo, Republic of the Total               2,839 2,839
Croatia                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             40,728 1,200 41,928
4DoD               1,461 1,013 1,005 1,128 4,607
Croatia Total             42,189 2,213 1,005 1,128 46,535
Cyprus                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  260 260
4DoD                  361 25 25 411
Cyprus Total                  621 25 25 671
Czech Republic                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  600 600
Czech Republic Total                  600 600
Djibouti                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               1,900 1,900
4DoD               1,172 1,172
Djibouti Total               3,072 3,072
Dominican Republic                     -  
5USAID                  500 500
Dominican Republic Total                  500 500
Ecuador                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               7,525 2,000 1,500 1,000 12,025
4DoD               3,791 1,207 91 5,089
Ecuador Total             11,316 3,207 1,591 1,000 17,114
Egypt                     -  
4DoD                  718 718
Egypt Total                  718 718
El Salvador                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               1,688 1,688
3CDC               2,840 2,840
5USAID               2,300 2,300
El Salvador Total               6,828 6,828
Eritrea                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             11,623 11,623
2DOS Other               1,560 1,560
3CDC                  450 450
4DoD               4,485 4,485
Eritrea Total             18,118 18,118
Estonia                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               2,499 2,499
4DoD               2,717 704 154 3,575
Estonia Total               5,216 704 154 6,074
Eswatini                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  439 439
4DoD                  836 836
Eswatini Total               1,275 1,275
Ethiopia                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               3,545 3,545
2DOS Other               1,500 1,500
3CDC               2,846 2,846
4DoD               3,984 3,984
5USAID               3,882 3,882
Ethiopia Total             15,757 15,757
Fiji                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  370 1,330 1,700
Fiji Total                  370 1,330 1,700
Georgia                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             31,405 0 2,000 2,000 35,405
2DOS Other               2,644 2,644
4DoD               4,596 1,980 3,875 3,295 13,746
5USAID               4,500 4,500
Georgia Total             43,145 1,980 5,875 5,295 56,295
Guatemala                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  900 900
Guatemala Total                  900 900
Guinea                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               1,103 1,103
Guinea Total               1,103 1,103
Guinea-Bissau                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               8,537 300 500 9,337
4DoD               1,444 1,444
Guinea-Bissau Total               9,981 300 500 10,781
Haiti                     -  
5USAID               3,500 3,500
Haiti Total               3,500 3,500
Honduras                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               1,464 1,464
Honduras Total               1,464 1,464
Hungary                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  350 350
Hungary Total                  350 350
India                     -  
5USAID                  300 300
India Total                  300 300
Iraq                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD           490,151 38,150 40,000 40,000 608,301
2DOS Other                  992 992
3CDC                  450 450
4DoD           105,552 130 253 480 106,415
Iraq Total           597,145 38,280 40,253 40,480 716,158
Jordan                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             23,636 400 400 400 24,836
2DOS Other                  300 300
3CDC               2,968 2,968
4DoD               2,418 2,418
Jordan Total             29,322 400 400 400 30,522
Kazakhstan                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               2,795 4,018 2,500 9,313
4DoD                  588 91 298 977
Kazakhstan Total               3,383 4,109 2,798 10,290
Kenya                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               1,482 1,482
4DoD               1,155 1,155
5USAID                  400 400
Kenya Total               3,037 3,037
Kosovo                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             19,725 1,000 800 21,525
4DoD               5,471 497 720 1,092 7,780
5USAID             17,472 17,472
Kosovo Total             42,668 1,497 1,520 1,092 46,777
Kyrgyzstan                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               3,785 2,000 2,500 2,000 10,285
4DoD                      7 7
Kyrgyzstan Total               3,792 2,000 2,500 2,000 10,292
Laos                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD           241,864 40,000 45,000 36,000 362,864
2DOS Other                  750 750
4DoD               7,053 4 7,057
5USAID             20,721 20,721
Laos Total           270,388 40,000 45,004 36,000 391,392
Lebanon                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             60,999 8,000 6,000 6,000 80,999
2DOS Other               2,000 2,000
4DoD               9,368 324 85 265 10,042
5USAID               9,850 9,850
Lebanon Total             82,217 8,324 6,085 6,265 102,891
Lesotho                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                    15 15
Lesotho Total                    15 15
Liberia                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  360 360
3CDC                  150 150
5USAID               4,429 4,429
Liberia Total               4,939 4,939
Libya                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             32,000 2,000 4,200 3,500 41,700
2DOS Other             19,575 19,575
4DoD                     -   340 340
Libya Total             51,575 2,000 4,200 3,840 61,615
Lithuania                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  500 500
Lithuania Total                  500 500
Malawi                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               1,630 1,300 500 3,430
Malawi Total               1,630 1,300 500 3,430
Mali                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               4,950 0 0 4,950
4DoD                  462 462
Mali Total               5,412 0 0 5,412
Marshall Islands                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               2,009 1,700 3,709
Marshall Islands Total               2,009 1,700 3,709
Mauritania                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               4,195 500 500 500 5,695
4DoD               4,410 4,410
Mauritania Total               8,605 500 500 500 10,105
Mexico                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  775 775
Mexico Total                  775 775
Moldova                     -  
4DoD               4,405 2,189 1,420 2,771 10,785
Moldova Total               4,405 2,189 1,420 2,771 10,785
Montenegro                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             10,599 1,700 12,299
4DoD               1,927 1,927
Montenegro Total             12,526 1,700 14,226
Morocco                     -  
4DoD                  678 164 1,154 36 2,032
Morocco Total                  678 164 1,154 36 2,032
Mozambique                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             34,782 1,000 500 36,282
2DOS Other               1,600 1,600
3CDC               2,100 2,100
4DoD             13,376 17 13,393
5USAID               4,533 4,533
Mozambique Total             56,391 1,000 517 57,908
Namibia                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               3,351 3,351
2DOS Other                  670 670
4DoD               5,494 5,494
Namibia Total               9,515 9,515
Nepal                     -  
4DoD                  237 237
5USAID               6,699 1,587 8,286
Nepal Total               6,936 1,587 8,523
Nicaragua                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               4,081 4,081
4DoD                  200 200
Nicaragua Total               4,281 4,281
Niger                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               5,693 1,000 1,000 1,000 8,693
4DoD                  328 328
Niger Total               6,021 1,000 1,000 1,000 9,021
Nigeria                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               1,449 1,449
4DoD                  691 691
Nigeria Total               2,140 2,140
North Macedonia                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               1,998 1,998
4DoD                  693 357 479 578 2,107
North Macedonia Total               2,691 357 479 578 4,105
Northern Triangle                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               2,500 3,000 2,000 5,000 12,500
Northern Triangle Total               2,500 3,000 2,000 5,000 12,500
Oman                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               1,785 1,785
4DoD               2,553 2,553
Oman Total               4,338 4,338
Pakistan                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  832 832
Pakistan Total                  832 832
Palau                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               5,111 820 380 60 6,371
4DoD                  216 73 115 115 519
Palau Total               5,327 893 495 175 6,890
West Bank/Gaza Strip                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               6,088 1,000 1,000 1,000 9,088
4DoD                  280 13 14 3 310
West Bank/Gaza Strip Total               6,368 1,013 1,014 1,003 9,398
Papua New Guinea                     -  
4DoD                     -   12 20 32
Papua New Guinea Total                     -   12 20 32
Paraguay                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  200 895 1,095
Paraguay Total                  200 895 1,095
Peru                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             18,006 1,000 1,605 2,000 22,611
4DoD             12,129 1,515 21 584 14,249
5USAID               1,000 1,000
Peru Total             31,135 2,515 1,626 2,584 37,860
Philippines                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  920 920
4DoD                  553 553
5USAID               1,550 1,550
Philippines Total               3,023 3,023
Romania                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               2,369 2,369
4DoD                  150 150
Romania Total               2,519 2,519
Rwanda                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               4,203 4,203
2DOS Other                  700 700
4DoD               7,790 7,790
5USAID               1,500 1,000 505 1,095 4,100
Rwanda Total             14,193 1,000 505 1,095 16,793
Sao Tome/Principe                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                    50 50
Sao Tome/Principe Total                    50 50
Senegal                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               4,755 500 500 500 6,255
2DOS Other                  260 260
4DoD               2,107 988 56 92 3,243
5USAID                  500 500
Senegal Total               7,622 1,488 556 592 10,258
Serbia                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             23,230 1,000 1,000 1,000 26,230
4DoD                  310 294 430 140 1,174
Serbia Total             23,540 1,294 1,430 1,140 27,404
Serbia & Montenegro                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               5,646 5,646
Serbia & Montenegro Total               5,646 5,646
Sierra Leone                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  147 147
4DoD                     -   0 39 608 647
5USAID               1,593 1,593
Sierra Leone Total               1,740 0 39 608 2,387
Slovak Republic                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               1,000 1,000
Slovak Republic Total               1,000 1,000
Slovenia                     -  
4DoD                  270 270
Slovenia Total                  270 270
Solomon Islands                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               4,688 1,000 5,688
2DOS Other                     -   2,500 2,500
4DoD               2,190 63 910 3,163
Solomon Islands Total               6,878 1,063 3,410 11,351
Somalia                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             33,050 4,000 4,000 4,000 45,050
Somalia Total             33,050 4,000 4,000 4,000 45,050
South Sudan                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             16,135 2,000 2,000 2,000 22,135
4DoD                  826 826
South Sudan Total             16,961 2,000 2,000 2,000 22,961
Sri Lanka                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             65,341 8,000 8,500 7,000 88,841
2DOS Other                  122 122
3CDC                  175 175
4DoD               4,502 308 25 1,170 6,005
5USAID             11,225 11,225
Sri Lanka Total             81,365 8,308 8,525 8,170 106,368
Sudan                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             24,427 24,427
Sudan Total             24,427 24,427
Sudan1                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               3,450 1,000 1,000 5,450
Sudan1 Total               3,450 1,000 1,000 5,450
Suriname                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  390 390
Suriname Total                  390 390
Syria                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             86,060 7,000 8,500 101,560
4DoD                    10 10
Syria Total             86,070 7,000 8,500 101,570
Tajikistan                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             22,983 3,300 3,310 2,500 32,093
4DoD               3,309 862 112 691 4,974
5USAID               2,880 2,880
Tajikistan Total             29,172 4,162 3,422 3,191 39,947
Tanzania                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                    16 16
4DoD                  920 920
5USAID               1,700 1,700
Tanzania Total               2,636 2,636
Thailand                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               4,190 4,190
4DoD             15,448 1,443 2,448 1,667 21,006
Thailand Total             19,638 1,443 2,448 1,667 25,196
Timor-Leste                     -  
4DoD                     -   22 344 101 467
Timor-Leste Total                     -   22 344 101 467
Togo                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                    32 32
Togo Total                    32 32
Tunisia                     -  
4DoD               1,383 1,383
Tunisia Total               1,383 1,383
Uganda                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                    56 56
4DoD                  207 207
5USAID               1,000 1,000
Uganda Total               1,263 1,263
Ukraine                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             57,067 10,397 71,000 90,000 228,464
2DOS Other               1,155 2,684 18,690 0 22,529
4DoD               7,090 717 786 22 8,615
5USAID               3,957 3,957
Ukraine Total             69,269 13,798 90,476 90,022 263,565
Uruguay                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD                  200 200
Uruguay Total                  200 200
Uzbekistan                     -  
4DoD                    99 99
Uzbekistan Total                    99 99
Vietnam                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD           131,480 18,200 21,620 25,000 196,300
3CDC               1,848 1,848
4DoD               6,205 1,387 1,268 943 9,803
5USAID             26,799 26,799
Vietnam Total           166,332 19,587 22,888 25,943 234,750
Yemen                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             44,355 4,000 4,875 3,000 56,230
4DoD               4,846 4,846
Yemen Total             49,201 4,000 4,875 3,000 61,076
Zambia                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD               2,050 2,050
4DoD                  437 2,082 2,519
Zambia Total               2,487 2,082 4,569
Zimbabwe                     -  
1DOS NADR - CWD             19,684 1,500 3,000 2,500 26,684
4DoD               4,337 185 253 55 4,830
Zimbabwe Total             24,021 1,685 3,253 2,555 31,514
Grand Total        4,031,718 270,261 392,770 398,261 5,093,010

 

Footnotes for funding history charts:

  1. In FY19, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras began receiving funding as a region.
  2. Serbia and Montenegro split into two countries in 2007.
  3. The “Sudan and South Sudan” budget line reflects the total funding for Sudan until 2011, when the country split into Sudan and South Sudan. The separate funding lines for “Sudan” and "South Sudan” reflect their respective separate funding totals since 2011.
  4. DOS - Other includes a variety of DOS funding sources.

DoD funds include OHDACA, the Research Development Test and Evaluation fund, the Humanitarian Assistance - Excess Property Program and the Iraq Relief and Construction fund. All U.S. Central Command demining-centric activities for FY10 were conducted with Theater Security Cooperation funding, not funding from U.S. OHDACA.

Back to General Information Menu

Back to Top