General Information
- Commonly Used Terms and Definitions
- A Message from Assistant Secretary Jessica Lewis
- The United States’ Commitment to Conventional Weapons Destruction
- 1993–2022 Global Overview of the U.S. Conventional Weapons Destruction Program
- Explosive Ordnance Disposal: Qualifications and Expertise
- Implementing Partners
- U.S. Conventional Weapons Destruction Funding
- Back to Main Menu
Commonly Used Terms and Definitions
Cluster Munitions Remnant Survey |
The application of all reasonable effort, through non-technical survey and technical survey procedures, to identify and define a confirmed hazardous area impacted by unexploded cluster munition remnants. |
Explosive Ordnance Disposal |
The detection, identification, evaluation, render safe, recovery and disposal of explosive ordnance. |
Explosive Ordnance Disposal Callout |
Investigation and disposal activity of suspected explosive ordnance(s). |
Explosive Ordnance Risk Education |
Activities which seek to reduce the risk of injury from mines or explosive remnants of war by raising awareness through public information dissemination, education, and training. |
Explosive Remnant of War |
Abandoned explosive ordnance and unexploded ordnance. |
Implementing Partner |
Organizations selected to implement specific grant agreements according to an agreed upon work plan. |
Improvised Explosive Device |
A device placed or fabricated in an improvised manner incorporating explosive material, destructive, lethal, noxious, incendiary, pyrotechnic materials or chemicals designed to destroy, disfigure, distract, or harass. They may incorporate military stores, but are normally devised from non-military components. |
Landmine |
An anti-personnel or anti-tank mine designed to be exploded by the presence, proximity or contact of a person and that will incapacitate, injure, or kill one or more persons or a mine designed to detonate by the presence, proximity or contact of a vehicle. |
Land Cleared |
A defined area cleared through the removal and/or destruction of all specified explosive ordnance hazards to a specified depth. |
Land Released |
The process of applying all reasonable effort to identify, define, and remove all presence and suspicion of explosive ordnance through non-technical survey and/or technical survey. |
Man-Portable Air Defense System (MANPADS) and Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGM) |
MANPADS are shoulder-fired surface-to-air missile consisting of a guided missile enclosed in a launch tube, a reusable trigger mechanism (“gripstock”), and a single-use battery or battery-cooling unit. ATGMs are guided missiles primarily designed to destroy armored military vehicles. |
Physical Security and Stockpile Management |
Standards for arms and ammunition maintenance including monitoring of stockpiles, training of qualified experts, facility upgrades and maintenance, and long-term planning for infrastructure, resources, and procurement associated with arms and ammunition. |
Stockpile Management Training |
The training of personnel in physical security and stockpile management |
Small Arms Ammunition |
Cartridges ranging in size from .22 caliber through 30 millimeter that are intended for various types of handheld or mounted weapons including rifles, pistols, revolvers, machine guns, and shotguns. |
Small Arms and Light Weapons |
Man-portable weapons systems designed either for individual use, or by two or three persons serving as a crew. For example: handguns, grenades launchers, machine guns, etc. |
Survivor Assistance |
Aid, relief, and support provided to explosive ordnance survivors to reduce the immediate and long-term medical and psychological implications of their trauma. |
Battle Area Clearance |
The systematic and controlled clearance of hazardous areas where the hazards are known not to include mines. |
Handheld Standoff Mine Detection System |
A dual sensor, handheld mine detector that combines an electromagnetic induction sensor, ground penetrating radar, and sophisticated algorithms to detect landmines while rejecting most clutter, also known as false positives. |
Humanitarian Mine Action |
Clearance, risk education, survivor assistance, advocacy, and stockpile destruction of mines and explosive remnants of war by humanitarian organizations to restore peace and security at the community level. |
International Ammunition Technical Guidelines |
An internationally recognized frame of reference developed by the United Nations to achieve and demonstrate effective levels of safety and security of ammunition stockpiles. |
International Mine Action Standards |
The framework by which the Anti-personnel Mine Ban Convention and Convention on Cluster Munitions can be practically implemented. |
Unexploded Ordnance |
Explosive ordnance that has been primed, fuzed, armed, or otherwise prepared for use or used. It may have been fired, dropped, launched, or projected, yet it remains unexploded either through malfunction or design or for any other reason. This does not include landmines or stockpiled ammunition and explosives. |
Weapons and Ammunition Destruction |
The process of final conversion of weapons, ammunition and explosives into an inert state that can no longer function as designed. |
Battle Area Clearance |
The systematic and controlled clearance of hazardous areas where the hazards are known not to include mines. |
DOS NADR-CWD |
Department of State - Nonproliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining and Related Programs |
DOS Other |
Department of State - Other funding |
CDC |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
DoD |
Department of Defense |
USAID |
U.S. Agency for International Development |
A Message from Assistant Secretary Jessica Lewis
As the fiscal year closed at the end of September 2022, I took stock of some of the incredible accomplishments of our conventional weapons destruction program. After deadly landmines are removed and booby-traps and improvised explosive devices are cleared, wheat fields are now ready for harvesting, children can run to school on a path, families can return to their partially destroyed homes, and elephants are able to migrate through grasslands. Elsewhere, man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS) and small arms and light weapons were secured or destroyed to prevent terrorists from acquiring them and attacking civilians. These are just some of the successes the U.S. Conventional Weapons Destruction Program achieves day after day, year after year, one step at a time. In fiscal year 2022, the United States again answered the call to confront the threats of landmines, unexploded ordnance, and unsecured small arms and light weapons, to make this world a better place. The dedication of all those involved in the removal of these hazards and securing weapons must be commended and applauded every time a life is saved due to their efforts. These successes are well documented in this year’s To Walk the Earth in Safety.
While conducting its unlawful war and full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia has intentionally polluted massive swaths of the country with landmines, explosive remnants of war, and improvised explosive devices. The Government of Ukraine estimated that, as of September 2022, 160,000 square kilometers of its land may have been contaminated—this is roughly the size of the states of Virginia, Maryland, and Connecticut combined, or nearly twice the size of Austria. These explosive hazards impede reconstruction, prevent displaced people from returning home, and continue to kill and maim Ukraine's innocent civilians. The United States is helping the Government of Ukraine address this urgent humanitarian challenge. U.S. funding supports humanitarian demining teams and is enabling a large-scale train and equip project to strengthen the Government of Ukraine’s demining and explosive ordnance disposal capacity.
One glaring consequence of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine is that farmers have lost their livelihoods waiting for landmine-riddled fields to be cleared so that they can once more supply the world with much-needed wheat, corn, and barley. Global food security has become a keystone of U.S. conventional weapons destruction efforts, and not just in Ukraine. For example, in Iraq, where the United States supports massive demining and battle area clearance programs, farmers can return to their land for the first time since Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) occupation and harvest wheat, one of the most lucrative crops there. In Serbia and elsewhere in the Balkans, U.S. demining efforts are enabling homeowners to tend once again to their backyard vegetable gardens and forage for mushrooms in the woods, supplementing their diets and providing extra income too.
We continue to chronicle in this year’s edition of To Walk the Earth in Safety how the United States empowers women to work in the humanitarian demining sector, including by leading demining teams in Vietnam, Sri Lanka and elsewhere. Women who work in peace and security positions, as part of demining teams or by providing explosive ordnance risk education, are a critical part of the process of post-conflict reconstruction and reconciliation. These women bring valuable perspectives to every endeavor, including conventional weapons destruction, with solutions often rooted in strengthening communities through inclusion and empowerment of all.
Environmental resiliency and conservation are a high priority for this Administration, and we have highlighted this effort in several stories included in this edition of To Walk the Earth in Safety. For example, in Zimbabwe we have cleared land so that wildebeests and other wildlife may roam freely without the threat of stepping on a landmine. The result will be a thriving ecosystem, safe wildlife migration, and economic development resulting from increased eco-tourism.
It is with all these goals in mind that I come to work not only as a public servant, but as a mother who wants all children to enjoy the beauty and peace this world has to offer. Every child, adult, and animal should be able to walk the earth in safety!
The United States’ Commitment to Conventional Weapons Destruction
Stockpiles of excess, poorly-secured, or otherwise at-risk conventional weapons continue to challenge peace and prosperity worldwide. In the wrong hands, small arms and light weapons, including more advanced types such as man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS), fuel political instability and violence and threaten international security. Aging ammunition stockpiles may also explode without warning, devastating nearby population centers and causing extensive contamination that can degrade soil and water sources. Meanwhile, landmines, improvised explosive devices, and explosive remnants of war, including cluster munition remnants, unexploded artillery shells and mortar shells, kill and maim people decades after conflicts end. Clearing land enables stabilization assistance, allowing displaced persons to return home, economic revitalization to begin, and political stability to take root. U.S. clearance and disposal efforts are returning land to productive use, while helping ensure air, soil, and water is clean and safe to use. These critical efforts help foster food security and climate resilience in communities affected by explosive hazards.
The U.S. Government’s Collaborative Approach

The United States is committed to reducing these threats worldwide and is the leading financial supporter of conventional weapons destruction, providing more than $4.6 billion in assistance to more than 120 countries and areas since 1993. The Department of State, Department of Defense, and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) work together with foreign governments, private companies, international organizations, and nongovernmental organizations to reduce excess small arms and light weapons and conventional munitions stockpiles (including MANPADS), implement best practices for physical security and stockpile management at conventional weapons storage sites, and carry out humanitarian mine action programs.
In fiscal year 2022, Department of State invested over $319 million* in conventional weapons destruction programs globally. It also led the U.S. interagency MANPADS Task Force, which coordinates counter-MANPADS efforts by the Departments of State, Defense, Homeland Security, and other relevant stakeholders, and helps partner nations eliminate or better secure the MANPADS they retain. In addition to these Department of State-led efforts, the Department of Defense Humanitarian Demining Training Center trains deminers, ammunition handlers, and stockpile managers from partner countries. The Department of Defense Humanitarian Demining Research and Development Program improves conventional weapons destruction technologies, enhancing the efficiency and safety of humanitarian demining around the world. USAID also assists survivors of landmine and explosive remnants of war, providing medical and rehabilitative care through the Leahy War Victims Fund.
Department of State Support for Conventional Weapons Destruction
The Department of State has managed more than 75 percent (more than $3.4 billion) of the United States’ contribution to conventional weapons destruction since 1993, with a three-fold objective:
- Enhance U.S. and international security by destroying and securing small arms and light weapons, including MANPADS, at risk of proliferation to terrorists, insurgents, and other violent non-state actors;
- Improve stability and prosperity by clearing landmines and explosive remnants of war and returning land to productive use;
- Build trust and deepen relationships with key partners to accelerate achievement of broader U.S. foreign policy objectives.
Robust project performance standards, enhanced monitoring and evaluation strategies, and a comprehensive program planning process guide the State Department’s Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement’s decisions and hold implementing partners accountable.
The measurable, tangible results that flow from the U.S. Government’s commitment to CWD strongly support U.S. foreign policy priorities. In addition, these programs help protect the lives and livelihoods of civilians so they can more safely remain in their own countries.
*Initial planned allocations
1993–2022 Global Overview of the U.S. Conventional Weapons Destruction Program
Countries with U.S. funded conventional weapons destruction activity in FY 2022:
- Afghanistan
- Angola
- Armenia
- Azerbaijan
- Caribbean Region
- Benin
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Burkina Faso
- Burma
- Cambodia
- Chad
- Colombia
- Congo, DR
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Ecuador
- Estonia
- Gaza Strip area
- Georgia
- Iraq
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Kyrgyz Republic
- Laos
- Lebanon
- Libya
- Malawi
- Mauritania
- Moldova
- Morocco
- Nepal
- Niger
- Pakistan
- Palau
- Papua New Guinea
- Peru
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Somalia
- Sudan
- South Sudan
- Solomon Islands
- Sri Lanka
- Tanzania
- Tajikistan
- Thailand
- Timor-Leste
- Togo
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- Vietnam
- West Bank area
- Yemen
- Zimbabwe
Countries that received U.S. support in the past:
- Argentina
- Bahrain
- Belize
- Bolivia
- Bulgaria
- Central African Republic
- Chile
- Congo, Republic of
- Czechia
- Dominican Republic
- Egypt
- Equitorial Guinea
- Eritrea
- Ethiopia
- Fiji
- The Gambia
- Guinea
- Haiti
- Hungary
- India
- Jamaica
- Kiribati
- Lesotho
- Liberia
- Lithuania
- Mali
- Marshall Islands
- Mexico
- Micronesia
- Nigeria
- Oman
- Paraguay
- Philippines
- Romania
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Surname
- Syria
- Tuvalu
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
Countries that are mine-impact free and received U.S. conventional weapons destruction support in FY2022:
- Albania
- El Salvador
- Guatemala
- Guinea-Bissau
- Honduras
- Jordan
- Kosovo
- Montenegro
- North Macedonia
- Rwanda
Countries that are mine-impact free and received U.S. conventional weapons destruction support in the past:
- Burundi
- Costa Rica
- Djibouti
- Eswatini
- Mozambique
- Namibia
- Nicaragua
- Tunisia
Country |
Funding received since 1993 (dollars in thousands) |
Iraq |
$675,678 |
Afghanistan |
$573,797 |
Laos |
$355,392 |
Vietnam |
$206,187 |
Colombia |
$206,099 |
Cambodia |
$191,899 |
Ukraine |
$174,353 |
Angola |
$158,548 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
$133,395 |
Lebanon |
$96,626 |
Region |
Total by region since FY1993 (dollars in thousands) |
Percent of total funding since FY1993 |
Africa |
$565,212 |
12.08% |
East Asia and Pacific |
$822,090 |
17.57% |
Europe |
$636,800 |
13.61% |
Middle East and North Africa |
$1,024,047 |
21.89% |
South and Central Asia |
$727,896 |
15.63% |
Western Hemisphere |
$291,101 |
6.22% |
Global/Multi-country |
$607,986 |
13.00% |
Total |
$4,678,457 |
100% |
FY2022 U.S. conventional weapons destruction measurable accomplishments:
- 174,670,025 square meters (43,161 acres) land cleared.
- 69,306,346 square meters (17,126 acres) land released.
- 16,561 explosive ordnance disposal callouts.
- 37,564 landmines destroyed.
- 200,112 explosive remnants of war destroyed.
- 9,099 ied or components cleared or destroyed.
- 3,436,0371 explosive ordnance risk education recipients.
- 53,714 survivor assistance recipients.
- 3,938 metric tons of unserviceable ammunition destroyed.
- 730 small arms and light weapons marked.
- 14,165 small arms and light weapons destroyed.
- 223 MANPADS, ATGMs or components destroyed.
- 775 personnel trained in stockpile management.
- 428 personnel trained in explosive ordnance disposal.
- 103 armories built or rehabilitated.
- 50 implementing partners.
1. This total reflects the number of recipients reached through in-person risk education. Mor than 18 million additional recipients were reached through social media in Ukraine.
Explosive Ordnance Disposal: Qualifications and Expertise
Article and images contributed by Drew Prater, Master EOD Technician. Edited by The Center for International Stabilization and Recovery, and the Department of State.
The United States is committed to assisting countries around the world that are contaminated with landmines and explosive remnants of war to make their land safe and productive again. This requires painstaking clearance work to detect, identify, render safe, and/or destroy explosive hazards, often in very austere environments. The people who do this lifesaving work are called explosive ordnance disposal operators / technicians, or humanitarian deminers. They come from countries worldwide, and some receive their training during military service, while others are trained by nongovernmental organizations and commercial companies.

The International Mine Action Standards provide specifications and guidance for the conduct of explosive ordnance disposal operations. These standards are a United Nations endorsed set of best practices for humanitarian mine action activities that are updated regularly based on lessons learned, and technological and procedural advancements. While the standards do not provide specific technical guidance for the disposal of particular types of explosive ordnance, they categorize training levels for operators into four distinct level—Levels 1, 2, 3 and 3+, with 3+ as the highest level of training.
Explosive ordnance disposal Level 1 is the basic level of explosive ordnance disposal training, which teaches the operator to locate, expose, and destroy in place the specific individual munitions upon which they have been trained. Individuals with Level 1 qualification may only perform this work under carefully controlled and supervised circumstances. The explosive ordnance disposal Level 1 operator can also function as a team member, assisting Level 2 and 3 operators on tasks requiring additional support.
Level 2 is the intermediate level of explosive ordnance disposal training. An explosive ordnance disposal operator with Level 2 qualification may perform all Level 1 tasks, as well as determine when it is safe to move and transport munitions. They can also conduct simultaneous disposal of multiple munitions but are still limited to those specific munitions upon which they have been trained. A Level 2 operator is qualified to conduct tasks in all environments with the written approval of an explosive ordnance disposal operator with Level 3 or above qualification.
The explosive ordnance disposal Level 3 qualification allows the operator to perform all Level 1 and 2 tasks, conduct procedures to render explosive hazards safe from unintended detonation, and control the final disposal of a wide range of specific types of explosive ordnance on which the individual has been trained. Level 3 operators can also authorize an explosive ordnance disposal Level 2 operator to perform tasks in various environments. As with Level 1 and Level 2 qualification, operators may only work with specific types of munitions on which they have been trained.

Excavation of an unexploded bomb near Mosul, Iraq.
Explosive ordnance disposal Level 3+ is the most advanced explosive ordnance disposal qualification, with the operator achieving competency in one or more of the following subjects: 1) advanced explosive theory; 2) bombs; 3) clearance of damaged tanks and other armored fighting vehicles; 4) basic chemical munitions and procedures; and 5) bulk demolitions and guided weapons. These competencies may be taught individually, meaning an explosive ordnance disposal Level 3+ operator qualification does not necessarily mean that training in all five skill sets has been received.
The U.S. Department of State requires that all operators engaged in humanitarian demining and battle area clearance funded by the U.S. Government be qualified according to International Mine Action Standards. By adhering to the International Mine Action Standards, nongovernmental organizations and companies funded by U.S. taxpayers can build competent teams to achieve the common goal of making land that was once contaminated with explosive hazards safe and productive again.
Implementing Partners
Nongovernmental Organizations Headquartered in the United States
Catholic Relief Services (CRS), established in 1943, is the official overseas relief and development agency of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. For more than a decade, Catholic Relief Services has worked to reduce the risk of injury or death from unexploded ordnance in Vietnam and trained children, teachers, parents, and community members in explosive ordnance risk education. http://crs.org
Development Alternatives Inc. is a U.S. based nongovernmental organization that works with national and local governments, bilateral and multilateral donors, private corporations, and philanthropies around the world to address fundamental social and economic development problems caused by inefficient markets, ineffective governance, and instability. https://www.dai.com/
The Golden West Humanitarian Foundation (GWHF) is a United States-based nonprofit charitable organization dedicated to innovation in training and technology, and overcoming limitations in humanitarian mine action operations. Golden West provides expert explosive ordnance disposal and physical security and stockpile management consulting, International Mine Action Standards and International Ammunition Technical Guidelines compliant training, and technology making humanitarian mine action safer, faster, and more cost effective. http://goldenwesthf.org
The Marshall Legacy Institute (MLI) is a Virginia-based nonprofit organization founded to help restore hope, alleviate suffering, and nurture stability in war-torn countries. Marshall Legacy Institute has established indigenous programs in 15 mine-affected countries that help rid them of landmines and their lasting impact. http://marshall-legacy.org
Momentum for Humanity (formerly United Cerebral Palsy of Los Angeles/Wheels for Humanity) is a California nonprofit founded in 2007 that helps people with mobility impairments maximize their independence and quality of life by building and strengthening rehabilitation services, including assistive technologies. https://turn4humanity.org/
PeaceTrees Vietnam is a Seattle-based nongovernmental organization founded in 1995 as a grassroots effort to bring peace, friendship, and renewal to the people of Quang Tri, one of the most war-torn provinces of Vietnam. PeaceTrees’ work includes mine and unexploded ordnance clearance, explosive ordnance risk education, survivor assistance, scholarships to landmine survivors and their families, and community restoration projects. http://peacetreesvietnam.org
The Polus Center for Social & Economic Development, established in 1979, is a Massachusetts-based nonprofit nongovernmental. The organization partners with public and private foundations to address the impact of mines and unexploded ordnance on communities around the world. http://poluscenter.org
World Education, Inc., a Massachusetts-based nonprofit organization, was founded in 1951 to meet the needs of the educationally disadvantaged and provides training and technical assistance in non-formal education across a wide array of sectors. World Education has worked to support survivor assistance, explosive ordnance risk education, and disability inclusion. http://worlded.org
International and Foreign Nongovernmental Organizations
Accessibility Organization for Afghan Disabled is a nonprofit and nonpolitical nongovernmental organization working for persons with disabilities along with their immediate family members as a peer-support, advocate organization founded in 2007 in Kabul, Afghanistan. https://aoad-af.page.tl/Home.htm
Afghan Technical Consultants, established in 1989, was the first humanitarian demining nongovernmental organization in Afghanistan endorsed by the United Nations. Afghan Technical Consultants work to reduce civilian casualties and enable land release through detection, clearance, and explosive ordnance risk education. http://atc-wlfhdngo.org.af
Agency for Rehabilitation and Energy Conservation in Afghanistan (AREA) is a non-governmental, non-political, non-profit developmental organization that envisions the achievement of peace and stability in Afghanistan through empowering communities at the grassroots level. https://area-org.af/
APOPO, established in 1995, is a registered Belgian nongovernmental organization and U.S. non-profit that trains sub-Saharan African pouched rats and mine detection dogs to help detect landmines, returning safe land back to communities for development so they can proceed with their lives. https://apopo.org/en
Arcangeles Foundation is a nonprofit working to improve the living conditions of vulnerable populations in Colombia. Its main objective is to achieve social inclusion and to ensure for future generations an inclusive and sustainable world. https://arcangeles.org/
The Colombian Campaign Against Landmines monitors fulfillment of the Ottawa Convention on behalf of the Colombian Government, compiles reports each year for the Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor, and supports survivor assistance and explosive ordnance risk education. https://colombiasinminas.org/
DanChurchAid (DCA) is an independent ecumenical humanitarian organization based in Copenhagen, Denmark, that provides humanitarian assistance and mine action programs combining explosive ordnance risk education, mine clearance, and community-development activities. http://dca.dk
Delvon Assistance for Social Harmony (DASH) is a Sri Lankan humanitarian demining organization founded in 2010 to increase the safety and security of people living in mine-affected areas through the removal and destruction of mines and unexploded ordnance. To support sustainable post-conflict recovery, the organization strives to employ displaced persons, especially widows and female heads of households. http://slnmac.gov.lk/services/de-mining/current-demining/dash.html
The Demining Agency for Afghanistan (DAFA), formed in 1990, is an Afghan humanitarian mine clearance organization. The organization's mission is to clear all hazardous and mine-contaminated areas in Afghanistan by committing resources to humanitarian demining, clearance for road reconstruction, local government-sponsored construction plans, and disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration. https://dafa.af
Free Fields Foundation is a neutral, nonprofit, humanitarian mine action organization founded in 2012 and based in Tripoli, Libya. Free Fields Foundation is accredited by the Libyan Mine Action Centre to conduct explosive ordnance risk education, non-technical survey, explosive ordnance disposal and battle area clearance. https://freefields.org
The HALO Trust (HALO) is the world’s largest humanitarian landmine removal organization. Its mission is to protect lives and restore livelihoods for those affected by conflict. HALO employs more than 8,600 staff and operates in over 25 countries and territories. HALO’s work, clearing landmines and other debris of war, creates safe and secure environments in some of the world’s most vulnerable communities. https://www.halotrust.org/
Humanitarian Disarmament and Peacebuilding (HDP), formerly Danish Demining Group, is a humanitarian mine action and armed violence reduction unit within the Danish Refugee Council, a non-profit and nongovernmental organization working to protect and provide long-lasting solutions to communities affected by war and armed conflict. https://drc.ngo/our-work/what-we-do/core-sectors/humanitarian-disarmament-and-peacebuilding/
Humanity & Inclusion works with persons with disabilities and other vulnerable populations in situations of conflict, natural disaster, exclusion, and extreme poverty. The organization implements mine action programs, working to clear mines and unexploded ordnance from civilian areas, providing explosive ordnance risk education programs, and rendering assistance to those who have been injured. https://www.hi-us.org/
Information Management and Mine Action Programs (iMMAP) is an international nonprofit nongovernmental organization that provides targeted information management support to partners responding to complex humanitarian and development challenges. iMMAP’s expertise in data collection, analysis, and presentation supports the decision-making process for its diverse, multi-sector partners. http://immap.org
The International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) is a coalition of NGOs whose stated objective is a world free of anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions, where mine and cluster munitions survivors see their rights respected and can lead fulfilling lives. http:// www.icbl.org/en-gb/home.aspx
ITF Enhancing Human Security (ITF) is a humanitarian nonprofit organization established by the Republic of Slovenia Government in March 1998. ITF focuses on humanitarian mine action, conventional weapons destruction, and other forms of post-conflict assistance and continues to expand its thematic and geographic scope of activities globally. https://www.itf.si
Mines Advisory Group (MAG) began operations in Afghanistan in 1989. In association with its U.S. partner MAG America, UK-based Mines Advisory Group is a humanitarian organization working in countries affected by conflict and insecurity to clear mines and unexploded ordnance, implement conventional weapons stockpile management and destruction programs, provide explosive ordnance risk education, and offer capacity-building support. https://www.maginternational.org
The Mine Clearance Planning Agency (MCPA) is an Afghan nongovernmental organization founded in 1990 specializing in landmine impact and post-clearance surveys, technical survey and battle area clearance, polygon surveys, and mine- and unexploded ordnance-impact free community surveys. The agency provides manual, mechanical, and mine detection dog clearance, explosive ordnance disposal, explosive ordnance risk education, mine action training, and management information systems for mine action programs. https://www.mcpa.org.af/contact/
The Mine Detection Center (MDC) was established in 1989 with the goal to free Afghanistan from the impacts of mines and unexploded ordnance so that individuals and communities can live in a safe environment conducive to national development. The center clears contaminated land and safely destroys mines and unexploded ordnance using a variety of assets and techniques. https://www.mdcafghan.org/
The Mine Detection Dog Center (MDDC) in Bosnia and Herzegovina trains dogs to detect landmines, explosives, narcotics, and to conduct search and rescue operations, and trains dog handlers and trainers. Currently dogs work in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iraq, Lebanon, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, Angola, Turkey, and other Southeast European countries. The center is also involved in humanitarian demining, explosive ordnance risk education and mine survivor assistance. http://www.mddc.ba/
Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA), a Norwegian nongovernmental organization, was founded in 1939 on the principles of solidarity, dignity, peace, and freedom. For more than 20 years, the organization has implemented mine action programs in more than 40 countries and territories. http://www.npaid.org
The Organization for Mine Clearance and Afghan Rehabilitation (OMAR) was established in 1990 to teach Afghan refugees and internally displaced Afghans about the dangers of mines and unexploded ordnance. In 1992, the organization expanded its operations to mine clearance, hiring and training more than 1,500 deminers in manual and mechanical demining, battle area clearance, explosive ordnance disposal, and working with mine detection dogs.
Results for Development (R4D) is a global nonprofit founded in 2008 that supports local change agents—government officials, civil society leaders, and social innovators—to drive reforms and engage in continuous improvement. https://r4d.org/
Skavita Humanitarian Assistance and Relief Project (SHARP) is a Sri Lankan nongovernmental organization based in Colombo that conducts humanitarian demining activities. skavita.sl@gmail.com
Spirit of Soccer (SOS), founded in 1996, is a UK- and U.S.-registered nonprofit that uses soccer/football skills clinics and tournaments to educate children about the dangers posed by mines and unexploded ordnance in conflict and post-conflict regions. Spirit of Soccer has created explosive ordnance risk education courses in post-conflict countries including Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cambodia, Colombia, Iraq, Jordan, Kosovo, Lebanon, Laos, Sri Lanka, and Moldova. http://spiritofsoccer.org
The Swiss Foundation for Mine Action (FSD) was established in 1997 and has worked in over 30 countries worldwide for the last 23 years. The overall objective of the foundation is to clear contaminated land of explosive contamination and to promote mine action in general; the foundation aims to mitigate the social, economic, and environmental impacts of landmines and environmental contamination worldwide. https://fsd.ch/en
Government and International Organizations
The International Committee of the Red Cross’s (ICRC) Physical Rehabilitation Program (PRP), formerly the ICRC MoveAbility Foundation was established in 1983 under the International Committee of the Red Cross and aims to improve physical rehabilitation capacities in low- and middle-income countries by maintaining and increasing access to quality and sustainable services. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/moveability-liquidation
International Organization for Migration (IOM), founded in 1951, helps ensure the orderly and humane management of migration, and provides humanitarian assistance to migrants in need, be they refugees, displaced persons, or other uprooted people. http://www.iom.int/
NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA), NATO’s integrated logistics and services provider, implements U.S. funded CWD programs in Bulgaria and Slovakia. NSPA also implemented the NATO Partnership for Peace Trust Fund in Ukraine which closed this year in the wake of Russia’s full-scale invasion, NSPA has also worked on physical security and stockpile management and conventional weapons destruction programs in several countries including Albania, Azerbaijan,Jordan, Mauritania, and Serbia. https://www.nspa.nato.int/
The Organization of American States (OAS) was established in 1948 with the goal of encouraging sustainable peace, justice, solidarity, collaboration, integrity, and independence among the nations of the Americas. The organization supports a regional approach to demining programs in the Western Hemisphere and executes conventional weapons destruction programs. https://oas.org
The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe is the world’s largest regional security organization with 57 participating states in Europe, Central Asia, and North America. The organization offers a forum for political dialogue and decision-making in the fields of early warning, conflict prevention, crisis management, and post-conflict rehabilitation. http://osce.org
The Regional Centre on Small Arms in the Great Lakes Region, Horn of Africa, and Bordering States (RECSA), established in 2005, helps build the capacity of its 15 African member countries, and coordinates and monitors the implementation of the Nairobi Protocol signed in April 2004. Its mission is to coordinate action against small arms and light weapons proliferation in the Great Lakes region, Horn of Africa, and bordering states. RECSA’s vision is a safe and secure sub-region in a peaceful continent, free from arms proliferation. http://recsasec.org
The Tajikistan National Mine Action Center (TNMAC) is a state institution under the government of the Republic of Tajikistan established in January 2014 to coordinate all mine action-related projects. muhabbat.ibrohimzoda@tnmac.gov.tj
The United Nations Development Program/Southeastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (UNDP/SEESAC) works to strengthen the capacities of national and regional stakeholders to control and reduce the proliferation and misuse of small arms and light weapons, advance gender equality, facilitate regional cooperation and thus contribute to enhanced stability, security, and development. https://www.seesac.org
The United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS), established in 1997 by the UN General Assembly, is housed in the Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Office of Rule of Law and Security Institutions. It is the coordinator for the Inter-Agency Coordination Group on Mine Action, which brings together working-level representatives of 12 UN mine action organizations to set priorities among UN participants and share information, and sets up and manages mine action coordination centers as part of peacekeeping operations. https://www.unmas.org/en
United Nations Regional Center for Peace, Disarmament, and Development in Latin America and the Caribbean (UNLIREC) is the UN regional entity specialized in disarmament, arms control and non-proliferation in the Latin American and Caribbean region. Its main function is to assist States to implement international instruments and commitments in these fields. https://unlirec.org/en/
United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS), established in 1973, helps advance sustainable implementation practices in development, humanitarian, and peacebuilding contexts in some of the world’s most challenging environments. Support is concentrated in areas where it has a clear mandate and expertise: infrastructure, procurement, project management, human resources, and financial management services. https://www.unops.org/
The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for international public health. The organization’s broad mandate includes advocating for universal healthcare, monitoring public health risks, coordinating responses to health emergencies, and promoting human health and well-being. https://www.who.int/
Academic Institutions
The Center for International Stabilization and Recovery (CISR), was established at James Madison University in 1996. Through its publications, training courses, fellowships, and web tools, the center supports information exchange within the humanitarian mine action and conventional weapons destruction communities. CISR produces To Walk the Earth in Safety, and publishes The Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction, which was first published in 1997 and is the longest-running source of information on conventional weapons destruction in the world. http://jmu.edu/cisr
The Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD), formed in 1998, supports the ongoing improvement of mine action performance. The Centre enables national authorities, mine action organizations, and other partners to do their jobs better by furthering knowledge, promoting norms and standards, and developing capacity. http://gichd.org
Johns Hopkins University-Bloomberg School of Public Health, based in Baltimore and founded in 1916, works with communities and populations to identify the causes of disease and disability, and implement large-scale solutions. https://www.publichealth.jhu.edu/
Small Arms Survey (SAS), based at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva, Switzerland, serves as the principal international source of public information on all aspects of small arms and armed violence, providing a valuable resource for governments, policymakers, researchers, and civil society. http://smallarmssurvey.org
Contractor
Tetra Tech is a leading provider of consulting and engineering services for projects worldwide. With 20,000 associates working together, Tetra Tech delivers clear solutions to complex problems in water, environment, infrastructure, resource management, energy, international development, and munitions response. https://www.tetratech.com/en/markets/international-development/services/stabilization/munitions-response
United States Conventional Weapons Destruction Funding
From 1993 through 2022, the United States contributed more than $4.6 billion for conventional weapons destruction programs in more than 120 countries or areas. The following charts provide a consolidated view of the United States’ funding for conventional weapons destruction globally. Budget figures for fiscal year 2021 (October 1, 2020–September 30, 2021) and prior years reflect actual allocations, while budget figures for fiscal year 2022 (October 1, 2021–September 30, 2022) reflect, with a few exceptions, initial planned allocations. The 23rd edition of To Walk the Earth in Safety will include updated figures for fiscal year 2022 that reflect the final allocations.
Abbreviation |
Definition |
DOS NADR-CWD |
Department Of State - Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining and Related Programs |
DOS Other |
Department Of State - Other Funding |
CDC |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
DoD |
Department of Defense |
USAID |
U.S. Agency for International Development |
Country |
Source |
FY93-FY19 |
FY20 |
FY21 |
*FY22 |
Total |
Afghanistan |
DOS NADR-CWD |
434,606 |
20,785 |
20,000 |
15,000 |
490,391 |
|
DOS Other |
20,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20,000 |
|
CDC |
1,800 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,800 |
|
DoD |
9,259 |
377 |
330 |
193 |
10,159 |
|
USAID |
51,447 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
51,447 |
|
Country Total |
517,112 |
21,162 |
20,330 |
15,193 |
573,797 |
Albania |
DOS NADR-CWD |
43,247 |
1,000 |
750 |
500 |
45,497 |
|
DoD |
2,636 |
1,807 |
663 |
3,380 |
8,486 |
|
USAID |
1,389 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,389 |
|
Country Total |
47,272 |
2,807 |
1,413 |
3,880 |
55,372 |
Angola |
DOS NADR-CWD |
117,604 |
7,000 |
4,000 |
8,500 |
137,104 |
|
DOS Other |
3,170 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,170 |
|
CDC |
150 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
150 |
|
DoD |
9,408 |
48 |
172 |
145 |
9,773 |
|
USAID |
8,351 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8,351 |
|
Country Total |
138,683 |
7,048 |
4,172 |
8,645 |
158,548 |
Argentina |
DoD |
579 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
579 |
|
Country Total |
579 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
579 |
Armenia |
DOS NADR-CWD |
4,292 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,292 |
|
DOS Other |
3,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,000 |
|
DoD |
3,768 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,768 |
|
USAID |
3,145 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,145 |
|
Country Total |
14,205 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14,205 |
Azerbaijan |
DOS NADR-CWD |
22,642 |
0 |
500 |
2,000 |
25,142 |
|
DOS Other |
1,100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,100 |
|
DoD |
7,229 |
0 |
0 |
2,225 |
9,454 |
|
Country Total |
30,971 |
0 |
500 |
4,225 |
35,696 |
Bahrain |
DoD |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
Country Total |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
Belize |
DOS NADR-CWD |
300 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
300 |
|
Country Total |
300 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
300 |
Benin |
DOS NADR-CWD |
0 |
562 |
500 |
0 |
1,062 |
|
DoD |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
|
Country Total |
14 |
562 |
500 |
0 |
1,076 |
Bosnia & Herzegovina |
DOS NADR-CWD |
91,455 |
3,000 |
4,400 |
4,650 |
103,505 |
|
DOS Other |
1,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,000 |
|
CDC |
3,210 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,210 |
|
DoD |
5,121 |
22 |
22 |
15 |
5,180 |
|
USAID |
20,500 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20,500 |
|
Country Total |
121,286 |
3,022 |
4,422 |
4,665 |
133,395 |
Bulgaria |
DOS NADR-CWD |
12,479 |
0 |
300 |
0 |
12,779 |
|
DoD |
51 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
51 |
|
Country Total |
12,530 |
0 |
300 |
0 |
12,830 |
Burkina Faso |
DOS NADR-CWD |
3,441 |
500 |
1,500 |
1,500 |
6,941 |
|
Country Total |
3,441 |
500 |
1,500 |
1,500 |
6,941 |
Burma (Myanmar) |
DOS NADR-CWD |
2,835 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,835 |
|
DOS-OTHER |
850 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
850 |
|
USAID |
4,350 |
1,000 |
0 |
0 |
5,350 |
|
Country Total |
8,035 |
1,000 |
0 |
0 |
9,035 |
Burundi |
DOS NADR-CWD |
1,935 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,935 |
|
DoD |
1,436 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,436 |
|
Country Total |
3,371 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,371 |
Cambodia |
DOS NADR-CWD |
111,342 |
11,405 |
9,000 |
9,000 |
140,747 |
|
DOS Other |
4,943 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,943 |
|
CDC |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
|
DoD |
28,137 |
1,012 |
1,361 |
515 |
31,025 |
|
USAID |
15,084 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15,084 |
|
Country Total |
159,606 |
12,417 |
10,361 |
9,515 |
191,899 |
Caribbean Region |
DOS NADR-CWD |
0 |
750 |
0 |
0 |
750 |
|
DOS Other |
0 |
1,100 |
0 |
0 |
1,100 |
|
Country Total |
0 |
1,850 |
0 |
0 |
1,850 |
Central African Republic |
DOS NADR-CWD |
1,009 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,009 |
|
Country Total |
1,009 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,009 |
Chad |
DOS NADR-CWD |
12,556 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
15,556 |
|
DoD |
5,190 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5,190 |
|
Country Total |
17,746 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
20,746 |
Chile |
DoD |
3,450 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,450 |
|
Country Total |
3,450 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,450 |
Colombia |
DOS NADR-CWD |
101,599 |
21,000 |
21,000 |
21,000 |
164,599 |
|
CDC |
450 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
450 |
|
DoD |
12,536 |
23 |
37 |
1,087 |
13,683 |
|
USAID |
21,367 |
3,000 |
500 |
2,500 |
27,367 |
|
Country Total |
135,952 |
24,023 |
21,537 |
24,587 |
206,099 |
Congo, DR |
DOS NADR-CWD |
24,334 |
3,000 |
3,000 |
2,000 |
32,334 |
|
DoD |
1,083 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,083 |
|
USAID |
7,597 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7,597 |
|
Country Total |
33,014 |
3,000 |
3,000 |
2,000 |
41,014 |
Congo, Republic of |
DOS NADR-CWD |
1,320 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,320 |
|
DoD |
1,519 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,519 |
|
Country Total |
2,839 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,839 |
Croatia |
DOS NADR-CWD |
40,728 |
0 |
1,200 |
0 |
41,928 |
|
DoD |
876 |
585 |
1,013 |
1,005 |
3,479 |
|
Country Total |
41,604 |
585 |
2,213 |
1,005 |
45,407 |
Cyprus |
DOS NADR-CWD |
260 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
260 |
|
DoD |
361 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
386 |
|
Country Total |
621 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
646 |
Czechia |
DOS NADR-CWD |
600 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
600 |
|
Country Total |
600 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
600 |
Djibouti |
DOS NADR-CWD |
1,900 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,900 |
|
DoD |
1,172 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,172 |
|
Country Total |
3,072 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,072 |
Dominican Republic |
USAID |
500 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
500 |
|
Country Total |
500 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
500 |
Ecuador |
DOS NADR-CWD |
6,025 |
1,500 |
2,000 |
0 |
9,525 |
|
DoD |
3,791 |
0 |
1,207 |
91 |
5,089 |
|
Country Total |
9,816 |
1,500 |
3,207 |
91 |
14,614 |
Egypt |
DoD |
718 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
718 |
|
Country Total |
718 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
718 |
El Salvador1 |
DOS NADR-CWD |
1,688 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,688 |
|
CDC |
2,840 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,840 |
|
USAID |
2,300 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,300 |
|
Country Total |
6,828 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6,828 |
El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras1 |
DOS NADR-CWD |
1,000 |
1,500 |
3,000 |
2,000 |
7,500 |
|
Country Total |
1,000 |
1,500 |
3,000 |
2,000 |
7,500 |
Eritrea |
DOS NADR-CWD |
11,623 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11,623 |
|
DOS Other |
1,560 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,560 |
|
CDC |
450 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
450 |
|
DoD |
4,485 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,485 |
|
Country Total |
18,118 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18,118 |
Estonia |
DOS NADR-CWD |
2,499 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,499 |
|
DoD |
2,717 |
0 |
0 |
704 |
3,421 |
|
Country Total |
5,216 |
0 |
0 |
704 |
5,290 |
Eswatini |
DOS NADR-CWD |
439 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
439 |
|
DoD |
836 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
836 |
|
Country Total |
1,275 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,275 |
Ethiopia |
DOS NADR-CWD |
3,545 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,545 |
|
DOS Other |
1,500 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,500 |
|
CDC |
2,846 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,846 |
|
DoD |
3,984 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,984 |
|
USAID |
3,882 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,882 |
|
Country Total |
15,757 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15,757 |
Fiji |
DOS NADR-CWD |
0 |
370 |
1,330 |
0 |
1,700 |
|
Country Total |
0 |
370 |
1,330 |
0 |
1,700 |
Georgia |
DOS NADR-CWD |
29,105 |
2,300 |
0 |
1,000 |
32,405 |
|
DOS Other |
2,644 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,644 |
|
DoD |
2,785 |
1,811 |
1,980 |
3,875 |
10,451 |
|
USAID |
3,998 |
502 |
0 |
0 |
4,500 |
|
Country Total |
38,532 |
4,613 |
1,980 |
4,875 |
50,000 |
Guatemala1 |
DOS NADR-CWD |
900 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
900 |
|
Country Total |
900 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
900 |
Guinea |
DOS NADR-CWD |
1,103 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,103 |
|
Country Total |
1,103 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,103 |
Guinea-Bissau |
DOS NADR-CWD |
8,037 |
500 |
300 |
0 |
8,837 |
|
DoD |
1,444 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,444 |
|
Country Total |
9,481 |
500 |
300 |
0 |
10,281 |
Haiti |
USAID |
3,500 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,500 |
|
Country Total |
3,500 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,500 |
Honduras1 |
DOS NADR-CWD |
1,464 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,464 |
|
Country Total |
1,464 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,464 |
Hungary |
DOS NADR-CWD |
350 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
350 |
|
Country Total |
350 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
350 |
India |
USAID |
300 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
300 |
|
Country Total |
300 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
300 |
Iraq |
DOS NADR-CWD |
446,651 |
43,500 |
38,150 |
40,000 |
568,301 |
|
DOS Other |
992 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
992 |
|
CDC |
450 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
450 |
|
DoD |
105,393 |
159 |
130 |
253 |
105,935 |
|
Country Total |
553,486 |
43,659 |
38,280 |
40,253 |
675,678 |
Jordan |
DOS NADR-CWD |
23,236 |
400 |
400 |
400 |
24,436 |
|
DOS Other |
300 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
300 |
|
CDC |
2,968 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,968 |
|
DoD |
2,418 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,418 |
|
Country Total |
28,922 |
400 |
400 |
400 |
30,122 |
Kazakhstan |
DOS NADR-CWD |
295 |
2,500 |
0 |
0 |
2,795 |
|
DoD |
0 |
588 |
0 |
91 |
679 |
|
Country Total |
295 |
3,088 |
0 |
91 |
3,474 |
Kenya** |
DOS NADR-CWD |
1,482 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,482 |
|
DoD |
1,155 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,155 |
|
USAID |
400 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
400 |
|
Country Total |
3,037 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,037 |
Kosovo |
DOS NADR-CWD |
14,725 |
5,000 |
1,000 |
800 |
21,525 |
|
DoD |
5,222 |
249 |
497 |
720 |
6,688 |
|
USAID |
17,472 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17,472 |
|
Country Total |
37,419 |
5,249 |
1,497 |
1,520 |
45,685 |
Kyrgyz Republic |
DOS NADR-CWD |
3,285 |
500 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
7,785 |
|
DoD |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
|
Country Total |
3,292 |
500 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
7,792 |
Laos |
DOS NADR-CWD |
204,364 |
37,500 |
40,000 |
45,000 |
326,864 |
|
DOS Other |
750 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
750 |
|
DoD |
7,045 |
8 |
0 |
4 |
7,057 |
|
USAID |
18,721 |
2,000 |
0 |
0 |
20,721 |
|
Country Total |
230,880 |
39,508 |
40,000 |
45,004 |
355,392 |
Lebanon |
DOS NADR-CWD |
55,999 |
5,000 |
8,000 |
6,000 |
74,999 |
|
DOS Other |
2,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,000 |
|
DoD |
9,324 |
44 |
324 |
85 |
9,777 |
|
USAID |
9,850 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9,850 |
|
Country Total |
77,173 |
5,044 |
8,324 |
6,085 |
96,626 |
Lesotho |
DOS NADR-CWD |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
|
Country Total |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
Liberia |
DOS NADR-CWD |
360 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
360 |
|
CDC |
150 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
150 |
|
USAID |
4,429 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,429 |
|
Country Total |
4,939 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,939 |
Libya |
DOS NADR-CWD |
29,000 |
3,000 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
36,000 |
|
DOS Other |
19,575 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19,575 |
|
Country Total |
48,575 |
3,000 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
55,575 |
Lithuania |
DOS NADR-CWD |
500 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
500 |
|
Country Total |
500 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
500 |
Malawi |
DoD |
130 |
1,500 |
1,300 |
0 |
2,930 |
|
Country Total |
130 |
1,500 |
1,300 |
0 |
2,930 |
Mali |
DOS NADR-CWD |
4,950 |
0 |
0 |
1,000 |
5,950 |
|
DoD |
462 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
462 |
|
Country Total |
5,412 |
0 |
0 |
1,000 |
6,412 |
Marshall Islands |
DOS NADR-CWD |
2,009 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,009 |
|
Country Total |
2,009 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,009 |
Mauritania |
DOS NADR-CWD |
3,195 |
1,000 |
500 |
500 |
5,195 |
|
DoD |
4,410 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,410 |
|
Country Total |
7,605 |
1,000 |
500 |
500 |
9,605 |
Mexico |
DOS NADR-CWD |
775 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
775 |
|
Country Total |
775 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
775 |
Moldova |
DoD |
2,823 |
1,582 |
2,189 |
1,420 |
8,014 |
|
Country Total |
2,823 |
1,582 |
2,189 |
1,420 |
8,014 |
Montenegro2 |
DOS NADR-CWD |
10,599 |
0 |
1,700 |
0 |
12,299 |
|
DoD |
1,927 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,927 |
|
Country Total |
12,526 |
0 |
1,700 |
0 |
14,226 |
Morocco |
DoD |
531 |
147 |
164 |
1,154 |
1,996 |
|
Country Total |
531 |
147 |
164 |
1,154 |
1,996 |
Mozambique |
DOS NADR-CWD |
34,782 |
0 |
1,000 |
0 |
35,782 |
|
DOS Other |
1,600 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,600 |
|
CDC |
2,100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,100 |
|
DoD |
13,376 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13,376 |
|
USAID |
4,533 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,533 |
|
Country Total |
56,391 |
0 |
1,000 |
0 |
57,391 |
Namibia |
DOS NADR-CWD |
3,351 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,351 |
|
DOS Other |
670 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
670 |
|
DoD |
5,494 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5,494 |
|
Country Total |
9,515 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9,515 |
Nepal** |
DOD |
237 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
237 |
|
USAID |
6,699 |
0 |
1,587 |
0 |
8,286 |
|
Country Total |
6,936 |
0 |
1,587 |
0 |
8,523 |
Nicaragua |
DOS NADR-CWD |
4,081 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,081 |
|
DoD |
200 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
200 |
|
Country Total |
4,281 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,281 |
Niger |
DOS NADR-CWD |
4,693 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
7,693 |
|
DoD |
328 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
328 |
|
Country Total |
5,021 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
8,021 |
Nigeria |
DOS NADR-CWD |
1,449 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,449 |
|
DoD |
691 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
691 |
|
Country Total |
2,140 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,140 |
North Macedonia |
DOS NADR-CWD |
1,998 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,998 |
|
DoD |
345 |
348 |
357 |
479 |
1,529 |
|
Country Total |
2,343 |
348 |
357 |
479 |
3,527 |
Oman |
DOS NADR-CWD |
1,785 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,785 |
|
DoD |
2,553 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,553 |
|
Country Total |
4,338 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,338 |
Pakistan** |
DOS NADR-CWD |
832 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
832 |
|
Country Total |
832 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
832 |
Palau |
DOS NADR-CWD |
4,311 |
800 |
820 |
0 |
5,931 |
|
DoD |
106 |
110 |
73 |
115 |
404 |
|
Country Total |
4,417 |
910 |
893 |
115 |
6,335 |
Papua New Guinea |
DoD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
12 |
|
Country Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
12 |
Paraguay |
DOS NADR-CWD |
200 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
200 |
|
Country Total |
200 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
200 |
Peru |
DOS NADR-CWD |
16,006 |
2,000 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
20,006 |
|
DoD |
11,961 |
168 |
1,515 |
21 |
13,665 |
|
USAID |
1,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,000 |
|
Country Total |
28,967 |
2,168 |
2,515 |
1,021 |
34,671 |
Philippines |
DOS NADR-CWD |
920 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
920 |
|
DoD |
553 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
553 |
|
USAID |
1,550 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,550 |
|
Country Total |
3,023 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,023 |
Romania |
DOS NADR-CWD |
2,369 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,369 |
|
DoD |
150 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
150 |
|
Country Total |
2,519 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,519 |
Rwanda** |
DOS NADR-CWD |
4,203 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,203 |
|
DOS Other |
700 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
700 |
|
DoD |
7,790 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7,790 |
|
USAID |
1,500 |
0 |
1,000 |
505 |
3,005 |
|
Country Total |
14,193 |
0 |
1,000 |
505 |
15,698 |
Sao Tome and Principe |
DOS NADR-CWD |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
|
Country Total |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
Senegal |
DOS NADR-CWD |
3,755 |
1,000 |
500 |
0 |
5,255 |
|
DOS Other |
260 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
260 |
|
DoD |
1,978 |
129 |
988 |
56 |
3,151 |
|
USAID |
500 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
500 |
|
Country Total |
6,493 |
1,129 |
1,488 |
56 |
9,166 |
Serbia2 |
DOS NADR-CWD |
22,230 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
25,230 |
|
DoD |
310 |
0 |
294 |
430 |
1,034 |
|
Country Total |
22,540 |
1,000 |
1,294 |
1,430 |
26,264 |
Serbia and Montenegro2 |
DOS NADR-CWD |
5,646 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5,646 |
|
Country Total |
5,646 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5,646 |
Sierra Leone |
DOS NADR-CWD |
147 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
147 |
|
DOD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
39 |
|
USAID |
1,593 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,593 |
|
Country Total |
1,740 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
1,779 |
Slovakia |
DOS NADR-CWD |
0 |
1,000 |
0 |
0 |
1,000 |
|
Country Total |
0 |
1,000 |
0 |
0 |
1,000 |
Slovenia |
DoD |
270 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
270 |
|
Country Total |
270 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
270 |
Solomon Islands |
DOS NADR-CWD |
4,628 |
60 |
0 |
0 |
4,688 |
|
DoD |
2,190 |
0 |
0 |
63 |
2,253 |
|
Country Total |
6,818 |
60 |
0 |
63 |
6,941 |
Somalia |
DOS NADR-CWD |
31,050 |
2,000 |
4,000 |
4,000 |
41,050 |
|
Country Total |
31,050 |
2,000 |
4,000 |
4,000 |
41,050 |
South Sudan3 |
DOS NADR-CWD |
14,135 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
20,135 |
|
DoD |
826 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
826 |
|
Country Total |
14,961 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
20,961 |
Sri Lanka |
DOS NADR-CWD |
59,841 |
5,500 |
8,000 |
8,500 |
81,841 |
|
DOS Other |
122 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
122 |
|
CDC |
175 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
175 |
|
DoD |
4,323 |
179 |
308 |
25 |
4,835 |
|
USAID |
7,900 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7,900 |
|
Country Total |
72,361 |
5,679 |
8,308 |
8,525 |
94,873 |
Sudan3 |
DOS NADR-CWD |
2,800 |
650 |
1,000 |
0 |
4,450 |
|
Country Total |
2,800 |
650 |
1,000 |
0 |
4,450 |
Sudan and South Sudan3 |
DOS NADR-CWD |
24,427 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24,427 |
|
Country Total |
24,427 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24,427 |
Surname |
DOS NADR-CWD |
390 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
390 |
|
Country Total |
390 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
390 |
Syria |
DOS NADR-CWD |
86,060 |
0 |
0 |
7,000 |
93,060 |
|
DoD |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
Country Total |
86,065 |
5 |
0 |
7,000 |
93,070 |
Tajikistan |
DOS NADR-CWD |
21,483 |
1,500 |
3,300 |
2,500 |
28,783 |
|
DoD |
2,870 |
439 |
862 |
112 |
4,283 |
|
USAID |
2,880 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,880 |
|
Country Total |
27,233 |
1,939 |
4,162 |
2,612 |
35,946 |
Tanzania** |
DOS NADR-CWD |
16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
|
DoD |
920 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
920 |
|
USAID |
1,700 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,700 |
|
Country Total |
2,636 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,636 |
Thailand |
DOS NADR-CWD |
4,190 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,190 |
|
DoD |
14,767 |
681 |
1,443 |
2,488 |
19,339 |
|
Country Total |
18,957 |
681 |
1,443 |
2,448 |
23,529 |
Timor-Leste |
DoD |
0 |
0 |
22 |
344 |
366 |
|
Country Total |
0 |
0 |
22 |
344 |
366 |
Togo** |
DOS NADR-CWD |
32 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
|
Country Total |
32 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
Tunisia |
DoD |
1,383 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,383 |
|
Country Total |
1,383 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,383 |
Uganda** |
DOS NADR-CWD |
56 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
56 |
|
DoD |
207 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
207 |
|
USAID |
1,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,000 |
|
Country Total |
1,263 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,263 |
Ukraine |
DOS NADR-CWD |
48,567 |
8,500 |
10,397 |
71,000 |
138,464 |
|
DOS Other |
0 |
1,115 |
2,684 |
19,500 |
23,339 |
|
DoD |
2,626 |
4,464 |
717 |
786 |
8,593 |
|
USAID |
3,957 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,957 |
|
Country Total |
55,150 |
14,119 |
13,798 |
91,286 |
174,353 |
Uruguay |
DOS NADR-CWD |
200 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
200 |
|
Country Total |
200 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
200 |
Uzbekistan |
DoD |
99 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
99 |
|
Country Total |
99 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
99 |
Vietnam |
DOS NADR-CWD |
113,980 |
17,500 |
18,200 |
19,000 |
168,680 |
|
CDC |
1,848 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,848 |
|
DoD |
5,621 |
584 |
1,387 |
1,268 |
8,860 |
|
USAID |
26,799 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26,799 |
|
Country Total |
148,248 |
18,084 |
19,587 |
20,268 |
206,187 |
West Bank & Gaza Strip Areas |
DOS NADR-CWD |
6,088 |
0 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
8,088 |
|
DoD |
225 |
55 |
13 |
14 |
307 |
|
Country Total |
6,313 |
55 |
1,013 |
1,014 |
8,395 |
Yemen |
DOS NADR-CWD |
39,555 |
4,800 |
4,000 |
2,000 |
50,355 |
|
DoD |
4,846 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,846 |
|
Country Total |
44,401 |
4,800 |
4,000 |
2,000 |
55,201 |
Zambia** |
DOS NADR-CWD |
2,050 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,050 |
|
DoD |
347 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
437 |
|
Country Total |
2,487 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,487 |
Zimbabwe |
DOS NADR-CWD |
17,184 |
2,500 |
1,500 |
3,000 |
24,184 |
|
DoD |
4,249 |
88 |
185 |
253 |
4,775 |
Global/Multi-country |
Country Total |
21,433 |
2,588 |
1,685 |
3,253 |
28,959 |
|
DOS NADR-CWD |
212,977 |
7,065 |
6,500 |
21,753 |
232,543 |
|
DOS Other |
1,450 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,450 |
|
CDC |
18,653 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18,653 |
|
DoD |
207,972 |
2,621 |
1,117 |
0 |
211,710 |
|
USAID |
123,836 |
6,954 |
9,123 |
10,717 |
143,630 |
|
Global Total |
564,888 |
16,640 |
16,740 |
32,470 |
607,986 |
GRAND TOTAL |
3,762,125 |
269,594 |
270,261 |
376,477 |
4,678,457 |
*Initial planned allocations
**Activity funded via FY20 Global/Multi-Country funding
Table 6‑2 U.S. conventional weapons destruction history by source.
Source |
FY93-FY19 |
FY20 |
FY21 |
*FY22 |
Total |
DOS NADR - CWD |
2,710,426 |
235,550 |
235,997 |
319,603 |
3,435,576 |
DOS Other4 |
68,186 |
2,255 |
2,684 |
19,500 |
92,625 |
CDC |
38,190 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
38,190 |
DoD5 |
555,838 |
18,333 |
19,370 |
23,652 |
617,193 |
USAID |
389,485 |
13,456 |
12,210 |
13,722 |
428,873 |
Grand Total |
3,762,125 |
269,594 |
270,261 |
376,477 |
4,678,457 |
Footnotes for funding history charts:
- In FY19, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras began receiving funding as a region.
- Serbia and Montenegro split into two countries in 2007.
- The “Sudan and South Sudan” budget line reflects the total funding for Sudan until 2011, when the country split into Sudan and South Sudan. The separate funding lines for “Sudan” and "South Sudan” reflect their respective separate funding totals since 2011.
- DOS - Other includes a variety of DOS funding sources.
DoD funds include OHDACA, the Research Development Test and Evaluation fund, the Humanitarian Assistance - Excess Property Program and the Iraq Relief and Construction fund. All U.S. Central Command demining-centric activities for FY10 were conducted with Theater Security Cooperation funding, not funding from U.S. OHDACA.