Module 1
- Overview
- Introduction
- Process
- Basic Principles
- Brief History
- What Research Must be Reviewed
- IRB Review Criteria
Module 2
- Overview
- Introduction
- Selecting Participants
- Describing Research
- Discussing Participation
- Ensuring Readability
- Assessing Understanding
Module 3
- Overview
- Continuing Review
- Unanticipated
Developments

- Adverse Events
- Consent Doc. Revisions
Module 4
- Student Test
- Faculty/Staff Test
Helpful Links
- NIH Protecting Human
Participants

- Office for Protection


JMU OSP

Overview of Informed Consent
IRB Review Criteria

The IRB uses the following criteria to review your research:

1.Risks to the subjects are minimized.

2.Risks to the subjects are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits.

3.Selection of subjects is equitable.

4.Informed consent is:

a.sought from each prospective participant or his or her legally authorized representative, and
b.properly documented.

5.Adequate preparation is taken to protect the privacy and confidentiality of subjects.

6.Adequate provisions are made for the ongoing monitoring of the subjects' welfare.

Continue to Module 2 -->

<-- Return to What Research Must be Reviewed

 

Useful Links:
-SPA Accounting
-Research & Public Service
-Academic Affairs
-Office of Technology
Transfer

Last Modified July 3, 2008

Quick Links: