Search JMU Web | Find JMU People | Site Index   
Policy #1104
The Institutional Review Board on the Use of Human Subjects in Research

Date of Current Revision: July 2002
Responsible Office: Chair, Institutional Review Board
  1. PURPOSE

    This policy provides for the establishment of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at James Madison University to oversee all human research at the university. The Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Research Participants is an independent compliance committee mandated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (See Title 45 Part 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.) The most recent version of the regulations, adopted in 1991, includes the adoption of the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, generally known as the "Common rule."

  2. AUTHORITY

    James Madison University is subject to the 45-CFR 46: Rules and Regulations to Assure the Protection of the Subjects of Human Research of the Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Each institution that conducts human research is required to establish a human research review committee... " The University committee charged with this responsibility is the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The role of the IRB is to protect the rights and welfare of individuals recruited to participate in research activities conducted under the auspices of James Madison University. The IRB has the authority to approve, require modifications in, or disapprove all research activities involving human participants that fall within its jurisdiction as specified by both the federal regulations and local institutional policy. Research that has been reviewed and approved by the IRB may be subject to review and disapproval by officials of the institution. However, those officials may not approve research if it has been disapproved by the IRB. Research that has been reviewed and approved by the IRB is subject to continuing IRB review and must be reevaluated at least annually, or more frequently if specified by the IRB.

  3. DEFINITIONS

    Human Subject (from the Federal Regulations--Section 102(f) of 45 CFR 46):
    Human subject means a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable private information.

    Institutional Review Board (IRB):
    The human research review committee at James Madison University.

    National Institutes of Health (NIH):
    The federal agency that requires training for all researchers funded by this agency.

  4. APPLICABILITY

    This policy applies to all research of any sort involving human research subjects that is conducted by any person who is a faculty or staff member or student at the university, regardless of where the actual research takes place. It also applies to research conducted by individuals who are not faculty members or students at the university, if the human subjects are members of the university community.

  5. POLICY

    No human research shall be conducted or authorized by James Madison University unless the IRB has reviewed and approved the proposed human research project.

    The National Institute of Health regulations state that all investigators and key personnel conducting research on NIH grants or contracts are required to undergo training in the protection of human subjects in research. To adopt the policies of Responsible Conduct of Research, JMU requires that all researchers complete at JMU-specific training course, including students and their faculty advisors. This on-line training will be coordinated by the Office of Sponsored Programs.

  6. PROCEDURES

  7. 6.1 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD
    See IRB membership Requirements at the following URL: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.107 6.2 CATEGORIES OF RESEARCH SUBJECT TO IRB REVIEW

    For purposes of the present policy, all research using human subjects must be reviewed and approved by the IRB prior to the initiation of the research project. Among the categories of human research which require direct IRB review are:

    6.3 CRITERIA USED FOR REVIEW OF PROPOSALS

    The IRB must review and approve the proposed human research project giving consideration to:

    6.4 INFORMED CONSENT

    No human research may be conducted in the Commonwealth without informing the human subject (or subjects) or the legally authorized representative of the subject in writing of the risks, procedures, and discomforts of the research. Consent must be documented in writing and supported by the signature. A voluntary consent form will be included as a part of any questionnaire research. (Appendix E) When research involves the use of minor participants, consent must be obtained from a parent or legal guardian. In addition, the minor participants over the age of 6 must provide their assent to participate, using a form appropriate for their age level. (Appendix F, Appendix G)

    Voluntary Informed Consent assures a person's right to exercise free power of choice regarding participation in research. The basic elements of information necessary for voluntary informed consent are:
    6.5 PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTING RESEARCH PROPOSALS TO THE IRB AND GAINING APPROVAL TO COMMENCE THE PROJECT:

    A researcher must submit a proposal to the IRB prior to initiation of the research project. The following steps are to be followed for each project:

    Protocol - Exemption Request:

    Protocol - Non-Exempt (Full):

    Initial IRB approval is granted for the duration of the project dates indicated on the Review Request Form; but for no more than one year. Researchers must submit a follow-up report at the conclusion of their research. This should be submitted to the Office of Sponsored Programs when the project is completed or no later than two weeks prior to the approved ending date. For multi-year projects, this report form should be submitted annually. (Appendix D)

    An on-line tutorial on how to complete an IRB application is available on the Sponsored Programs web site and in both Student (Appendix H) and Faculty (Appendix I) brochures.

    6.6 STATEMENT OF CONCERN/COMPLAINT

    Any person who has a complaint about a human research project shall submit in writing to the Chairperson of the IRB a statement of complaint and a brief description of the events that document the complaint. The Chairperson shall refer the complaint to the IRB to determine if there has been a violation of protocol.

    If the IRB determines that this policy has been violated or that the project was conducted in violation of protocol, it shall recommend to the President the course of action the university should take, including the possibility of a sanction to be imposed against the researcher.

    6.7 TRAINING

    Every person involved in a research project that includes the use of human subjects must complete a training course and successfully pass a certification exam. The training and test can be found on the Sponsored Programs web page. Training is required regardless of whether the project is externally funded. Training must include key foreign and domestic personnel on subcontracts and consultants, and it applies whether or not these individuals are compensated from the award. The training requirement encompasses students and their advisors when conducting any kind of research, including classroom-based projects. Although subject to modification based on changing federal guidelines, training is currently required annually for each student investigator and recommended every 3 years for faculty/staff.

    The web based training program required of all research personnel, including students and their research advisors, may be found on the Sponsored Programs IRB home page.

    Investigators carrying out federally sponsored research that involves human subjects can obtain further training on the web at the NIH website. Completing training through NIH does not release the researcher from having to complete the web-based training package provided by JMU.

    6.8 SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES

    There are additional notifications required for specialized activities as follows:

    1. If a research project will be conducted in the residence halls, Director of Residence Life should be notified.
    2. If a research project is to be conducted in the Warren Campus Center or in another non-academic activity area subject to the policies within the Student Handbook, the Director of Student Activities and the Vice President for Student Affairs must be notified of the proposed study.
    3. If a research project will require the use of the University mail system to distribute questionnaires to students on campus, the Manager of Postal Services should be notified.

    If a research project is to be conducted off-campus, a letter of approval from the appropriate site coordinator or senior administrative official must be obtained in advance and submitted along with the approval request.

  8. RESPONSIBILITIES

    The IRB is responsible for reviewing research protocols concerning human research, evaluating those proposals to determine if they meet the requirements, and approving or disapproving such proposals. Additionally, the IRB is responsible for monitoring ongoing projects previously approved, handling complaints concerning human research projects, and making recommendations on sanctions to the President.

    Faculty members are responsible for ensuring that projects conducted as part of a class are submitted for review by the IRB.

    The Office of Sponsored Programs is responsible for updating procedures, forms and providing training for researchers through the web based program in section 6.7 above.

  9. SANCTIONS

    Any researcher who fails to abide by this policy is subject to sanctions, up to and including termination of employment with the university for faculty and staff members, expulsion from the university for students, and being barred from any further research on the university campus for researchers outside of the university.

    Sanctions will be commensurate with the severity and/or frequency of the offense and may include termination of employment.

  10. EXCLUSIONS

    In certain cases, the IRB chair or his/her designee may approve a protocol as being eligible for exemption from IRB review. Exemption requests must be submitted to the IRB, and approval received prior to conducting the research, using the procedure described in 6.5. Examples of studies which may be eligible for exemption follow:

    • those conducted solely within the confines of the classroom or within a departmental research participant pool even when they
      • Are a general requirement of a course,
      • Have the sole purpose of developing the student's research skills, and
      • Will be overseen by a faculty member;
    • those conducted outside the classroom and outside departmental research participant pools, provided they do not involve minors, do not target special adult populations, do not pose a risk of physical harm to pregnant women and fetuses, do not deal with a topic of sensitive or personal nature, or do not involve any type of activity that places the participants at more than minimal risk;
    • those that are part of a larger research project that has current James Madison University IRB approval;
    • Or those that are part of a larger research project that has current approval of a registered IRB at another institution, provided that, if research participants are to be recruited at James Madison University, the College's IRB has given permission for such on-campus recruitment.

  11. INTERPRETATION

    The authority to interpret this policy rests with the president, and is generally delegated to the Director of Sponsored Programs and the IRB Chair.

Original version: December 7, 1992

Approved:

July 2002
Linwood H. Rose, President

Index Terms

Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Human Research
Human Subjects
Sponsored Programs

Appendices
All relevant forms are located at Office of Sponsored Programs Forms.