Supreme Court Justice
Clarence Thomas:
Madison 'struck the balance
on the balance on the side of liberty'
At times the Constitution might seem like "an anachronistic
hindrance," Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told
an overflow Wilson Hall audience at the James Madison Day Convocation
in March. That hindrance was deliberately contrived. James Madison created
the "separation of powers not because it would lead to strong government,
but because it would lead to inefficient government.
"By creating an inefficient central government,"
Thomas explained, "Madison meant to protect society.
He
deliberately struck the balance on the side of liberty."
In so doing, Thomas said, James Madison created "a
constitution that is admired the world over."
Thomas gave the keynote address to five standing ovations
at the James Madison Day Convocation, the central event of the weeklong
JMU 250th anniversary celebration of James Madison's birth on March
16, 1751. He also answered questions submitted by students in the audience
and after the program had lunch with a group of 25 students.
In 1991 Thomas became the second African-American named
to the Supreme Court. At 53, he is the youngest Supreme Court justice
and has carved out a prominent role as one of the court's most conservative.
A leading critic of civil rights orthodoxy, he has also led the revival
of the natural law approach to original intent jurisprudence. Thomas
specifically looks to the nation's other founding documents, most notably
the Declaration of Indepenence, for guidance in interpreting the Constitution.
Thomas is the first sitting Supreme Court justice to
speak at JMU and drew media coverage from C-SPAN, the Atlanta Constitution,
the Associated Press and Virginia news outlets. In addition to the full
house in Wilson Hall, several hundred more students and professors watched
Thomas' address via closed-circuit television at five campus locations.
By recognizing "universal principles" in
the Constitution - including "that men by nature become tyrannical,
so government must be limited" - Thomas said Madison has enabled
the United States "to enjoy unprecedented political stability and
economic and social prosperity for more than two centuries.
"Madison and the other framers made a significant
advance in politics and political theory," the Supreme Court justice
explained, "an advance that allowed them to create a government
strong enough to defend itself and the liberties of its people, but
limited enough that it would itself not become the destroyer of those
self-same liberties."
Madison "found safety for freedom in a multiplicity
of forces," including federalism, which Thomas called "another
safeguard" of liberty. Although federalism allowed both slavery
and segregation to flourish, Thomas conceded, federalism acts as a check
on national government and, as a subsidiary effect, protects states'
rights.
Federalism "didn't just de-centralize decision
making or diffuse power," he added. It "created independent
sovereigns that can't be commandeered or taxed by another" and
"creates organizations of resistance against unjust use of [national]
power."
The Supreme Court justice said, "This is a theme
that has gone unnoticed but which underlies the court's current federalism
jurisprudence."
The thinking behind "this resurrection of federalism"
is that "local or state government is more responsive because it
is closer to the people," Thomas explained. States can tailor legislation
to local conditions and needs, protecting and creating new rights. "At
a broader level, the existence of numerous states, each making certain
decisions concerning the allocation of resources and the balance between
public power and private rights creates a beneficial marketplace of
policies."
The jurisprudence of federalism is reflected in court
rulings, Thomas said, since "the Supreme Court answers cases. We
don't respond on broad principles. All of these mechanisms protect liberties
and a private ordering of life," he said. "
Some see
all these constitutional checks and balances as bothersome or cumbersome
or inconvenient im-pediments to majority rule.
"Every age has its important policies that some
people believe must be enacted at any cost to the constitutional structure,"
he continued. "Far from being a vise, though, these checks and
balances - the double security, as Madison called them, double security
for our liberties - are the genius of our system of government. And,
I might add, the genius of James Madison. For what is an impediment
to the majority will is equally an impediment to governmental tyranny.
"For our liberties, designed by our James Madison
and the other founders, should be in working order so that, in the words
of Abraham Lincoln, 'government of the people, by the people and for
the people shall not perish from the face of the this Earth,'"
Thomas concluded.
"That, my friends, would be a worthy birthday
present for Mr. Madison."
By Pam Brock
|