Values Clarification Syllabus
20 minutes
|
Introduction & Ice Breaker
|
|
|
This opening section is used to help participants and
facilitators feel comfortable with one another and make some
connections. This section might also be used to set down some
ground rules. A set of standard ground rules is provided in your
facilitator's manual. It is also helpful when the facilitators tell
why they volunteered for the program.
- Introduction of facilitators
- Ground Rules (Overhead)
- What is values clarification? (Overhead)
- Introduction of Participants
Select one of the following interactive exercises:
- What has Influenced Your Values?
- Coat of Arms
|
10 minutes
|
Mini-Lecture on Values & Integrity
|
|
|
Values & Integrity are at the core of our decision-making.
We live based on what we value and we live with integrity if we say
what we mean and do what we say. This section of the workshop gives
time for you to specifically address and define values and
integrity. Additional lecture notes can be found in your
facilitator's manual.
Overhead: "Value, Integrity, Ethics" -
defines these three terms
Overhead: "Three Steps to Acting with
Integrity"
Use examples from your own life or someone you know who has acted
with integrity. Have students give examples.
Overhead: "The Valuing Process" see
lecture notes for definitions.
Use examples from your own life or someone you know who has used
this process. Have students give personal examples.
Also try to engage students in a dialogue!
|
30 minutes
|
Name Your Values
|
|
|
This is the section that focuses on drawing out the
participant's personal values. During this time, participants get
the opportunity to identify their values and present their top five
values to the group. Reminding participants that we need to respect
other's values can be an important statement in helping
participants to feel comfortable sharing.
Select one of the following activities:
- Values Planner exercise (HANDOUT). Have
students work on this individually and then report back to the
class their top five values and how much they spend. Writing these
on the board helps students to see the diverse values which they
and others in the class select or see how they have a lot in common
with others in the room.
-OR-
- Participants should select their top 5 values from the Terminal
and Instrumental Values lists (HANDOUTS). Students
should write their top five values on a sticker nametag which they
wear for the remainder of the workshop. WHY?
&So that you can refer to them during other exercises which
call for participants to use their values. As the facilitator, you
should call into question when their choices in an exercise go
against their stated values. Terminal Values are
those which are ultimate goals.Instrumental Values
are those that often help us reach towards the other larger
goals.
|
|
Discuss World Values, differentiate between
personal and universal values.
Have students try to determine what they think the 5 top world
values are. List them on the board.
Overhead: Top five world values. Compare
the two lists. What are the similarities and differences? Other
conversation starters:
- How do we know what someone values? Or what a group
values?
- Do your values differ greatly from the world values?
- Do you object to any world values?
**Optional: See lecture notes for ways to remember 5 world values.
Optional Overhead: Abe Lincoln |
15-25 minutes
|
Academic Integrity & Video
|
|
|
Ask:
- What does JMU Value? How do you know what JMU values? -hints:
JMU policies, admissions standards, aesthetics of campus, honor
code, etc.
- One way we can discover what JMU values is by looking at their
expectations for Academic Integrity
- Show Honor Council video. Ask students what values they feel
JMU stresses through their honor code.
The purpose of this section is to apply values to academic
dishonesty cases.
- HANDOUT: A question of plagiarism, from Ethics
and College Student Life by Kenneth Strike and Pamela Moss. Handout
copy of University honor code to each student. Divide students into
3 groups and have them each answer a question together. Have the
groups report back their answers to everyone.
-OR-
- Divide students into 3 or 4 groups and HANDOUT
an academic integrity scenario/case study to each group. Have them
determine the answers to the questions and then report back to the
group about the case and what they decided.
|
25 minutes
|
A Double-Check
|
|
|
This section of the workshop is used to challenge students to
put their values to work. Can they act with integrity by doing as
they say, i.e. their announced values. Choose either of these
activities:
- Take a Stand (ACTIVITY)
- What would you do? (ACTIVITY)
(for this activity, you can divide the class into groups and have
them discuss one or two of the questions and then present back to
the class.)
|
60 minutes
|
Ethics & Ethical Behavior
|
|
|
The focus now shifts to Ethics.
Lecture Notes: While you have previously told
them that you cannot give "rights and wrongs" about values, ethics
is a practice of "right and wrong". But ethical standards,
integrity and values connect in that they are standards of conduct,
either self-imposed (values), how we represent ourselves
(integrity) or other's expectations (ethics).
- Review definitions of ethics, ethical behavior, and an ethical
dilemma. (OVERHEAD)
- Review Kitchener's ethical principles
(OVERHEAD)
Have students work in small groups and give examples of each
principle. In small groups design an act that illustrates the
principle your group was given. Present act to the whole
class.
- Have participants describe an "ethical person". Continue the
discussion by asking the students to give an example of an "ethical
person" in their own lives. This could be done in small
groups.
- Review Ethics Checklist Questions
(OVERHEAD). Ask students to review a decision
they've made, maybe even the one that brought them here, using this
checklist or make up a ethical decision yourself and have them use
the ethical checklist to actually make a decision. Give students
time to think on their own. Discuss as a group what the process was
like (what was easy, what was difficult).
- Use Situations Ranking (HANDOUT) to
allow students the experience of making ethical decisions. This
also helps students to see how their values play a role in decision
making. Complete individually and then in a small group.
|
15 minutes
|
Relation to Campus Life
|
|
|
Ethics often guide established standards. Standards used to
ensure our community's safety: LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS, and
POLICIES. Use this section of the workshop to discuss our
community's standards.
- Discuss how to recognize acceptable & unacceptable behavior
at JMU: Honor Code, Judicial Policies, Virginia State Law,
Residence Hall Policies, Personal Values, Ethics - what you've
been taught is right and wrong, and Common Sense.
- Why is it important to have community standards?
- Discuss how students' values interact with the community
standards. What if a student's values conflict with policies?
|
20 minutes
|
Confirming Your Values
|
|
|
During this section of the workshop, the goal is to focus
students on planning how they will apply what has been discussed in
class to their future decision-making.
- Ask students to take a look back at their original five values
they have listed on their nametag. Have they been consistent in
their actions towards those values (INTEGRITY)?
Would they change any? Have they learned anything new about
themselves?
- Have students complete the "Reflecting on the Values
Clarification Workshop" activity (HANDOUT).
|
|
- Discuss major points and review for the assessment.
See Lecture notes.
- Have each student complete an assessment form and submit it
before leaving!!!
- Facilitators should turn in a feedback form to the program
assistant on duty. Your feedback is valued and is used to update
curriculum!
|
There are extra activities, case studies, and
discussions available in the back of the facilitator
manual.
You may insert breaks at your discretion.
Students may wish to have several short breaks or 1 larger break.
Feel free to use breaks as necessary.
© 1997. This syllabus was created by
Rebecca Poma through the compilation of work by Donna Harper, James
Madison University and Susan Mullane, University of Miami. Updated
1999 and 2001 during assessment revisions.