COMING SOON!
The Social Indicator Database Project by The Governor's Office for Substance Abuse Prevention (GOSAP). Follow the above link for a detailed description of the project and what it will allow users to do.


Science-Based Programs and Practices:
Over the last several years, prevention research has placed much emphasis on the identification and implementation of science-based programs. As a result, many prevention programs have undergone an extensive review process to affirm that effects are definitively linked to program implementation and not to outside factors or events. The links below provide access to national agencies or organizations that review prevention programs for effectiveness.


Center for Substance Abuse Prevention
U.S. Department of Education
         2001 SDFSCA Exemplary and Effective Programs
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Center for Disease Control and Prevention



Keeping Up:
Prevention programming and practices are constantly changing each day. It is up to prevention practitioners to evolve with the changes. The following links provide cutting-edge information regarding substance abuse, risk and protective factors, strategies, program planning and evaluation. As well, each site links to many other sites which provide a vast array of supplementary materials.

Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration
Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America
Southeast Center for Applied Prevention Technologies
CSAP's Decision Support System
University of Kansas Community Tool Box
National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information



Data Sources:

Collecting data is often perceived as a tedious and time-consuming task; however, it is a necessary process if one truly wants to a "paint a picture" of a community's strengths and weaknesses. Through the data collection process, a community begins to identify the risk and protective factors present and the resources available. Thereafter the community as a whole can collaborate to make positive and effective changes. Law enforcement agencies, schools, health departments, social services agencies, the Alcohol Beverage Control, Community Services Boards, unemployment offices and multiple other agencies are required to annually submit data to State-level departments. Data is richly available per locality to assist is developing your community's picture. The following links serve as valuable resources for data collection.

Virginia's Social Indicator Data
U.S. Bureau of the Census
National Criminal Justice Reference Services
U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics

COMING SOON!
The Social Indicator Database Project by The Governor's Office for Substance Abuse Prevention (GOSAP). Follow the above link for a detailed description of the project and what it will allow users to do.





Surveys (local and national):
It is important that communities use a valid survey which will allow comparisons to national findings as well as to surrounding localities. Below are the primary youth surveys available for a community's use. Of notable importance is the understanding that data from youth surveys portray the community at-large and not just the environment in which they were implemented. Visit the website to research survey content and costs.

Local Surveys:
The American Drug and Alcohol Survey
PRIDE Survey
Youth Risk Behavior Survey
Communities That Care

National Surveys:
Monitoring the Future
SAMHSA's National Survey on Drug Use and Health



Risk and Protective Factors:
David Hawkins and Richard Catalano have distinguished themselves as "the" research gurus regarding the risk and protective factor framework. For several years, Hawkins and Catalano have been researching the tested (and supported) hypothesis that the more risk factors that a child experiences, the more likely they will encounter substance abuse (and other risky behaviors) in adolescence or young adulthood. Their research has also found that by reducing the number of risks in a child's life, the less likely they will become involved in risky behaviors or social problems. The risk and protective factor framework is intended for assessing risk and protective factors in a community. It refers to the presence of factors in the broader population.

Risk Factors: Personal and environmental factors that place a child at higher risk of substance abuse and negative behaviors.

Protective Factors: Personal and environmental factors that help reduce the risk of substance abuse and other negative behaviors.

NOTE: Although a child may be exposed to a significant number of risk factors, it does not necessarily mean that substance use or other problem behaviors will inevitably follow. Many children and youth growing up in presumably high-risk families and environments emerge relatively free of problems.

Risk and protective factors exist at every level at which an individual interacts with others and the society around him/her. These factors have typically been organized by life domains in which interactions occur. These domains are Individual, Peer, Family, School, Community and Society/Environmental. A seventh domain -- the Workplace -- has begun to be recognized.

Key Risk and Protective Factors by Life Domains
DOMAIN
PROTECTIVE FACTORS
RISK FACTORS
Individual
  • Positive personal characteristics, including social skills and social responsiveness; cooperativeness; emotional stability; positive sense of self; flexibility; problem-solving; and low levels of defensiveness.
  • Bonding to societal institutions and values, including attachment to parents and extended family; commitment to school; regular involvement with religious institutions; and belief in society's values.
  • Social and emotional competence, including good communication skills; responsiveness; empathy; caring; sense of humor; inclination toward pro-social behavior; problem-solving skills; sense of autonomy; sense of purpose and of the future (e.g., goal-directedness); and self-discipline.
  • Inadequate life skills.

  • Lack of self-control, assertiveness, and peer-refusal skills.
  • Low self-esteem and self-confidence.
  • Emotional and psychological problems.
  • Favorable attitudes toward substance abuse.
  • Rejection of commonly held values and religion.
  • School failure.
  • Lack of school bonding.
  • Early antisocial behavior such as lying, stealing, and aggression, particularly in boys, often combined with shyness and hyperactivity.
Family
  • Positive bonding among family members.
  • Parenting that includes high levels of warmth and avoidance of severe criticism; sense of basic trust; high parental expectations; and clear and consistent expectations, including children's participation in family decisions and responsibilities.
  • An emotionally supportive parental/ family milieu, including parental attention to children's interests; orderly and structured parent-child relationships; and parent involvement in homework and school-related activities.
  • Family conflict and domestic violence.
  • Family disorganization.
  • Lack of family cohesion.
  • Social isolation of family.
  • Heightened family stress.
  • Family attitudes favorable to drug use.
  • Ambiguous, lax, or inconsistent rules and sanctions regarding substance use.
  • Poor child supervision and discipline.
  • Unrealistic expectations for development
Peer
  • Association with peers who are involved in school, recreation, service, religion, or other organized activities
  • Association with delinquent peers who use or value dangerous substances.
  • Association with peers who reject mainstream activities or pursuits.
  • Susceptibility to negative peer pressure.
  • Strong external locus of control.
School
  • Caring and support; sense of "community" in classroom and school.
  • High expectations from school personnel.
  • Clear standards and rules for appropriate behavior.
  • Youth participation, involvement, and responsibility in school tasks and decisions.
  • Ambiguous, lax, or inconsistent rules and sanctions regarding drug use and student conduct.
  • Favorable staff and student attitudes toward substance use.
  • Harsh or arbitrary school management practices.
  • Availability of dangerous substances on school premises.
  • Lack of school bonding
Community
  • Caring and support.
  • High expectations for youth.
  • Opportunities for youth participation in community activities.
  • Community disorganization.
  • Lack of community bonding.
  • Lack of cultural pride.
  • Lack of competence in majority culture.
  • Community attitudes favorable to drug use.
  • Ready availability of dangerous substances.
  • Inadequate youth services and opportunities for pro-social involvement.
Society/ Environmental
  • Media literacy (resistance to pro-use messages).
  • Decreased accessibility.
  • Increased pricing through taxation.
  • Raised purchasing age and enforcement.
  • Stricter driving-while-under-the-influence laws.
  • Impoverishment.
  • Unemployment and underemployment.
  • Discrimination.
  • Pro-drug-use messages in the media.
Excerpt from Understanding Substance Abuse Prevention -- Toward the 21st Century: Background Information. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (1999).

For more information regarding risk and protective factors, visit the following websites and explore the World Wide Web:

Social Development Research Group
Partners for Substance Abuse Prevention
South Carolina Dept. of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Services



Evaluation:
Evaluation is a systematic process of obtaining credible information to be used by interested persons for the purposes of program improvement and program assessment.

Why Evaluate?
In general, program evaluation is designed to verify, document and quantify program activities and their effects. Program evaluation is also a process to ultimately improve the program effectiveness and service delivery to the target populations served. Evaluation is an integral part of the day-to-day operations and management of programs and, thus, is an on-going activity. A well-planned evaluation effort provides valuable information for decision-making.

American Evaluation Association (http://www.eval.org) is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel, evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation.

The Evaluation Center (http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/) is located at Western Michigan University. It is a research and development unit that provides national and international leadership for advancing the theory and practice of evaluation as applied to education and human services.

Planning and Evaluation Service of the U.S. Department of Education (http://www.ed.gov/offices/OUS/eval/). This website includes information on practices and methodology in educational evaluation and survey instruments currently available to the public. Evaluation tools and an Evaluation Primer can be downloaded.

CSAP's Decision Support System (www.preventiondss.org) contains a tremendous amount of information regarding evaluation. Click on the "Evaluate Programs" tab and meander through the multiple links.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Program Information Contact: James Madison University,
Office of Substance Abuse Research, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807,
Phone: 540-568-3317


This page was last updated:    June 28, 2005