Skip to Main Content

News

Events

  • May 9: Graduate Commencement Ceremony
  • May 9: University Commencement Ceremony
  • May 10: College Commencement Ceremonies
  • More >

News

Events

  • Apr 24: Jean Cash Lecture Series Speaker John Harrell
  • Apr 25: Logic and Reasoning Institute Colloquium
  • Apr 26: Morrison-Bruce Center's ColorBlast 5K
  • More >

News

Events

  • May 9: Graduate Commencement Ceremony
  • May 9: University Commencement Ceremony
  • May 10: College Commencement Ceremonies
  • More >

News

Events

  • May 9: Graduate Commencement Ceremony
  • May 9: University Commencement Ceremony
  • May 10: College Commencement Ceremonies
  • More >

News

Events

  • May 9: Graduate Commencement Ceremony
  • May 9: University Commencement Ceremony
  • May 10: College Commencement Ceremonies
  • More >

News

Events

  • May 9: Graduate Commencement Ceremony
  • May 9: University Commencement Ceremony
  • May 10: College Commencement Ceremonies
  • More >

Academic Program Review

You are in the main content
Cover Photo Image


Academic Administrative Areas

Academic Administrative Area APRs are reviews conducted on programs in the Division of Academic Affairs that support academic programs but do not offer degrees or are not driven by student outcomes. These guidelines are negotiated prior to the start of the self-study by the involved administrative unit and representatives chosen by the provost from the supervising vice provost, director and others. Recommendations by national organizations/professional bodies should be considered in developing guidelines. The schedule for Academic Administrative Area APRs is determined by the Division of Academic Affairs and the individual administrative unit, and they must be conducted on a five-year cycle.

Stages of Academic Administrative Area APR

Stage One: The academic support area APR Internal Self-Study committee develops a written self-study based on consultation between the office of the Vice Provost for Academic Programs and the administrative area. Recommendations by national organizations/professional bodies should be considered in developing guidelines. The self-study is submitted to the Office of the Provost.
Stage Two: The completed self-study is reviewed by representatives chosen by the Vice Provost for Academic Programs. After reviewing the Internal Self-Study Report, these representatives identify specific areas to be addressed and the makeup of the external team.
Stage Three: The external team reviews the documents provided by the university, conducts an on-site visit and submits a written External Team Report (ERT).
Stage Four: Within four weeks of receiving the ERT, the head of the administrative area develops an action plan for integrating the results of the self-study and, if applicable, a consultation report.
Stage Five: After approval by the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, the action plan must be added as an objective into the Planning Database and reinforced in the program's annual report. Stage Five is an ongoing process, and the results should continue to be included in the annual report until recommendations have been addressed.